Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32356275›Full record

GuidelineClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2020

ECO-SEOM-SEEO safety recommendations guideline for cancer patients receiving intravenous therapy.

I Magallón-Pedrera, J Pérez-Altozano, J A Virizuela Echaburu, C Beato-Zambrano, P Borrega-García, J C de la Torre-Montero

Open access · hybridAbstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Comment on: "ECO-SEOM-SEEO safety recommendations guideline for cancer patients receiving intravenous therapy", looking to the future.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

I Magallón-PedreraOncology Nursing Service, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Spanish Society of Oncology Nursing (SEEO), Barcelona, Spain.
J Pérez-AltozanoMedical Oncology Service, Virgen de los Lirios de Alcoy Hospital, Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM), Alicante, Spain.
J A Virizuela EchaburuMedical Oncology Service, Virgen Macarena University Hospital, Foundation for Excellence and Quality in Oncology (ECO), Seville, Spain.
C Beato-ZambranoMedical Oncology Service, Virgen Macarena University Hospital, Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM), Seville, Spain.
P Borrega-GarcíaMedical Oncology Service, Hospital San Pedro Alcántara, Foundation for Excellence and Quality in Oncology (ECO), Cáceres, Spain.
J C de la Torre-MonteroComillas Pontifical University, San Juan de Dios School of Nursing and Physical Therapy, Spanish Society of Oncology Nursing (SEEO), Alberto Aguilera, 25, 28015, Madrid, Spain. juliodelatorre@comillas.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6843-8234
Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena · ESHebron University · PSHospital San Pedro · ESUniversidad Pontificia Comillas · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCancer patients require implantation of venous access devices to meet their personalized therapeutic needs, which are often complex due to the nature of the medication and the disease status. Therefore, it is essential to have standardized protocols that guarantee the best results in health and patient safety.

methodsTo learn about the availability of protocols and aspects related to safety in clinical practice and to detect possible opportunities for improvement, a survey has been conducted in various Spanish hospitals, in addition to a review of the evidence regarding the various devices available and complications associated with the administration of chemotherapy.

resultsAs a result of both analyses, the Foundation for Excellence and Quality in Oncology (ECO), the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM), and the Spanish Society of Oncology Nursing (SEEO) have developed a catheter selection algorithm based on patient characteristics and treatment to facilitate the clinical decision-making process, as well as some recommendations aimed at ensuring patient safety and rational use of available resources.

conclusionsIn conclusion, both the venous access catheter selection algorithm and the proposed recommendations aim to respond to the needs revealed in clinical practice and to become an integrable tool in electronic prescription systems to offer homogeneous criteria for action in cancer patients that require venous access, optimizing the use of available health resources with the highest safety and quality of life for the patient.

Indexed as

Medical OncologyNeoplasmsPatient SafetyAdultCatheters, IndwellingFemaleHumansInfusions, IntravenousMaleMiddle AgedOncology NursingSocieties, MedicalCancer therapyClinical practice surveyDecision algorithmEvidence-based recommendationsSafetyVenous access

Identifiers

PMID32356275
PMCPMC7505883
OpenAlexW3021469151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.