Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32356128›Full record

ArticleMaternal and child health journal2020

Acceptability and Feasibility of Hair and Salivary Biomarker Collection Among Multiethnic School-Age Children.

Eileen M Condon, Amalia Londono Tobon, Linda C Mayes, Lois S Sadler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Recruitment and retention of adolescents for an ecological momentary assessment measurement burst mental health study: The MHIM engagement strategy.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eileen M CondonYale School of Nursing, 400 West Campus Drive, Orange, CT, 06477, USA. Eileen.Condon@yale.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7747-5870
Amalia Londono TobonYale Child Study Center, 230 S Frontage Rd, New Haven, CT, 06519, USA.
Linda C MayesYale Child Study Center, 230 S Frontage Rd, New Haven, CT, 06519, USA.
Lois S SadlerYale School of Nursing, 400 West Campus Drive, Orange, CT, 06477, USA.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
TRAINING PROGRAM IN CHILDHOOD NEUROPSYCHIATRIC DISORDERST32MH018268 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Michael H Bloch, MICHAEL J CROWLEY · 1985 to 2026
$11.0M
Research Training: Self and Family ManagementT32NR008346 · NINR · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI GREY, MARGARET · 2003 to 2018
$4.7M
Biological, Behavioral, and Genetic Mechanisms in the Intergenerational Transmission of Toxic StressK99NR018876 · NINR · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CONDON, EILEEN · 2019 to 2020
$180k
Toxic Stress and Protective Factors in Multiethnic School Age ChildrenF31NR016385 · NINR · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CONDON, EILEEN · 2016 to 2017
$80k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH018268NINR NIH HHS F31 NR016385NINR NIH HHS F31NR016385NINR NIH HHS K99 NR018876NINR NIH HHS T32 NR008346NINR NIH HHS T32NR008346Sigma Theta Tau International Alpha Nu Chapter
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAs noninvasive biological markers gain increasing popularity in pediatric research, it is critical to understand how study participants perceive these measures, especially among groups underrepresented in biobehavioral research, like children and people of color. The purpose of this study was to examine acceptability and feasibility of hair and salivary biomarker collection in an urban community sample of ethnically diverse children (age 4 to 10 years).

methodsNinety-seven mother-child dyads were recruited for a cross-sectional follow up study of the Minding the Baby® home visiting intervention. Children were Hispanic (63%), Black (34%), and multi-racial (3.1%). A conventional content analysis was conducted using two sources of data: (1) mothers' responses to open-ended interview questions on their views and suggestions regarding biomarker collection, and (2) field notes recorded by investigators.

resultsForty-four percent of mothers reported biomarker-related questions or concerns, including questions about the purpose of biomarker testing, and concerns about cosmetic issues, child discomfort, and future use of biomarker data. Mothers also offered positive feedback and advice for collection. Issues affecting feasibility included children's hair length and style, refusal to participate, and behavioral or developmental issues.

conclusionsHair and salivary biomarker collection was largely acceptable and feasible in this sample. Strategies for promoting ethical and sensitive biomarker collection include respectful explanations and parental involvement, creating a comfortable and safe environment for the child, flexible collection strategies, and attention to development, cultural preferences and perspectives.

Indexed as

HairSalivaBiomarkersChildChild, PreschoolChi-Square DistributionCross-Sectional StudiesEthnicityFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleSpecimen HandlingBiomarkersChild healthHealth disparitiesMothersParent–child relations

Identifiers

PMID32356128
PMCPMC7378972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.