Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32356092›Full record

ArticlePrimates; journal of primatology2020

Investigating reactions of squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus) towards unequal food distributions in a tray-pulling paradigm.

Benoit Bucher, Maxime Bourgeois, James R Anderson, Hika Kuroshima, Kazuo Fujita

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Primates; journal of primatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Benoit BucherDepartment of Psychology, Graduate School of Letters, Kyoto University, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan. bucherbenoit@live.fr.
Maxime BourgeoisDepartment of Psychology, Graduate School of Letters, Kyoto University, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan.
James R AndersonDepartment of Psychology, Graduate School of Letters, Kyoto University, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan.
Hika KuroshimaDepartment of Psychology, Graduate School of Letters, Kyoto University, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan.
Kazuo FujitaDepartment of Psychology, Graduate School of Letters, Kyoto University, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan.
Kyoto University · JPJapan Society for the Promotion of Science · JP

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 15K12047Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 16H01505Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 16H01726Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 16H06301Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 25118002Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP16J11113
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fact that squirrel monkeys do not routinely cooperate in the wild has been proposed to explain their failure to show disadvantageous inequity aversion (i.e., negative reactions when receiving less than a partner) in an experimental exchange. Here we assessed whether the use of a tray-pulling paradigm, allowing for a larger variety of unequal testing situations, would bring additional insights into inequity aversion in this species. Squirrel monkeys were tested in pairs in which only the donor could pull a tray baited with food to within reach of itself and a recipient. Using pairs with different social relationships, we examined donors' frequencies of pulling both in the presence and absence of a recipient, as well as across three different food distributions: equal, qualitative inequity (higher-value reward for the recipient), and quantitative inequity (no food reward for the donor). Results showed that female donors pulled the tray less often in the quantitative inequity condition with an out-group female recipient than when alone. However, such discrimination was not observed when females were with female in-group and male out-group recipients. By contrast, male donors did not adjust their pull frequencies according to the recipient's presence or identity (female and male out-group recipients). These results point towards possible disadvantageous inequity aversion in female squirrel monkeys. However, alternative hypotheses such as increased arousal caused by out-group female recipients cannot be ruled out. We discuss the data in line with major theories of inequity aversion and cooperation in primates.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorFoodRewardAnimalsFemaleMaleSaimiriCooperationInequity aversionNew world monkeySquirrel monkey

Identifiers

PMID32356092
OpenAlexW3023454470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.