Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32356074›Full record

Trial reportLung2020

A Randomized, Controlled, Pilot Study of CPAP for Patients with Chronic Cough and Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

Krishna M Sundar, Alika M Willis, Sarah Smith, Nan Hu, Jay P Kitt, Surinder S Birring

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lung, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03172130 (Prospective Study of Efficacy of Sham CPAP vs. Straight CPAP on Cough Intensity in Patients With Chronic Cough), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03172130 nacompletednot on this map

Prospective Study of Efficacy of Sham CPAP vs. Straight CPAP on Cough Intensity in Patients With Chronic Cough

TypeinterventionalSponsorKrishna M. SundarRan2014 to 2019Enrolled22ConditionsChronic Cough, OSAArmsStraight CPAP, Sham CPAP
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. WAO - ARIA consensus on chronic cough: Executive summary.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. OSA and Chronic Respiratory Disease: Mechanisms and Epidemiology.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Krishna M SundarDepartment of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. krishna.sundar@hsc.utah.edu.
Alika M WillisDepartment of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Sarah SmithSleep-Wake Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Nan HuFamily & Preventive Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Jay P KittDepartment of Biomedical Informatics and Department of Chemistry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Surinder S BirringCentre for Human & Applied Physiological Sciences, School of Basic & Medical Biosciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
University of Utah · USKing's College London · GB

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF UTAH MEDICAL INFORMATICS TRAININGT15LM007124 · NLM · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI Karen Louise Eilbeck · 1997 to 2026
$22.0M
NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007124
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn association between chronic cough and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) has been reported in prior studies with resolution or improvement in cough after continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy. Controlled studies of the benefit of CPAP on cough-quality of life measures have not been conducted. RESEARCH QUESTION: Does CPAP therapy for OSA improve cough in patients with chronic unexplained cough? STUDY DESIGN AND

methodsPatients with unexplained chronic cough (> 2 months duration of cough) and OSA were randomized to receive either CPAP or sham CPAP therapy for 6 weeks. The primary end point was the change in health status assessed with the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) in patients treated with CPAP vs. sham CPAP. Secondary end points were changes in exhaled breath condensate markers of airway inflammation (interleukin-6, nitrite/nitrates, hydrogen peroxide and 8-isoprostanes).

resultsA total of 22 patients with chronic unexplained cough and OSA were randomized of whom18 completed 6 weeks of treatments with either CPAP or sham CPAP. The CPAP vs. sham CPAP-treated group were comparable in terms of sex distribution, body mass index, and OSA severity. Following CPAP therapy, there was a significantly greater improvement in total LCQ scores as compared to those treated with sham therapy (ANCOVA p value 0.016). No significant differences were noted in the exhaled breath condensate marker changes between CPAP-treated vs. sham CPAP-treated groups.

conclusionTreatment of comorbid OSA in patients with chronic cough improved cough quality of life measures following treatment of OSA with CPAP in this pilot study. Larger studies to understand this association and unravel mechanisms of CPAP benefit in chronic cough need to be undertaken. Clinical Trial Registration NCT03172130.

Indexed as

AdultAgedChronic DiseaseContinuous Positive Airway PressureCoughFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsSleep Apnea, ObstructiveTreatment OutcomeContinuous positive airway pressureCoughObstructive sleep apneaSham treatment

Identifiers

PMID32356074
PMCPMC8286636
OpenAlexW3022728495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.