Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32355991›Full record

ReviewBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2020

[Digital interventions in prevention and health promotion: What kind of evidence do we have and what is needed?]

Florian Fischer

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [On the Effectiveness of Digital Workplace Health Promotion in Times of Home Office: A Systematic Review].Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [Community-based Disease Prevention and Health Promotion: Promoting Digital Health Literacy among People in Precarious Living Conditions].Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. [Digital Applications in the Planning and Implementation of Structural Health Promotion and Prevention Settings: Results of a Scoping Review].Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Enhancing preventive medicine over curative medicine: Role of telemedicine.Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2021
    Article
  18. [Evidence-based primary prevention and health promotion: methods and procedures in 5 research consortia].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Florian FischerInstitut für Gerontologische Versorgungs- und Pflegeforschung, Hochschule Ravensburg-Weingarten, Weingarten, Deutschland. florian.fischer@rwu.de.
University of Applied Sciences Ravensburg-Weingarten · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital technologies increasingly affect our daily lives and interact with our living environment. A high potential for prevention and health promotion is referred to digital interventions. So far, however, there is a lack of well-founded evidence on the effectiveness of such measures. This paper will address the challenges of evidence-based digital interventions in prevention and health promotion. The results are summarised in the form of a narrative review.So far, evidence-based medicine methods have not been sufficiently used in the evaluation of benefits and harms in the field of prevention and health promotion. The reasons for this are found in the complexity of the corresponding measures. This complexity is further increased by digital interventions. Nevertheless, it is urgently recommended to place a stronger focus on evidence-based interventions in order to enable meaningful and comprehensible evaluation procedures with regard to the effectiveness of digital interventions in prevention and health promotion.Digitalisation leads to new demands on prevention and health promotion. A critical perspective on the actual impact of digital interventions and their social implications is needed. The development of a solid knowledge base is necessary in order to promote acceptance of the technologies and to achieve sustainable implementation.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based MedicineTelemedicineGermanyHealth EducationHealth PromotionPreventive MedicineTechnologyBenefitEffectivenesse‑HealthHarmm‑Health

Identifiers

PMID32355991
OpenAlexW3021690555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.