Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32355988›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgery2020

See (n)One, Do (n)One, Teach (n)One: Reality of Surgical Resident Training in Germany.

T Huber, I Richardsen, C Klinger, M Mille, A A Roeth, AsTerOiD-Study Group

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

T HuberYoung Surgeons Working Group (CAJC) of the German Society for General and Visceral Surgery (DGAV), Berlin, Germany. tobias.huber@unimedizin-mainz.de.
I RichardsenYoung Surgeons Working Group (CAJC) of the German Society for General and Visceral Surgery (DGAV), Berlin, Germany.
C KlingerGerman Society for General and Visceral Surgery (DGAV), Berlin, Germany.
M MilleYoung Surgeons Working Group (CAJC) of the German Society for General and Visceral Surgery (DGAV), Berlin, Germany.
A A RoethYoung Surgeons Working Group (CAJC) of the German Society for General and Visceral Surgery (DGAV), Berlin, Germany.
AsTerOiD-Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDue to technological changes, working time restrictions and the creation of specialized centers, surgical training has changed. A competence-based learning technique of surgical skills is the sub-step practice approach, which has been proven important in nationwide opinion surveys. The aim of this prospective multi-center trial was to determine the status quo of the sub-step concept in Germany.

methodsOver 6 months, the voluntarily participating centers evaluated the following index procedures: laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LCHE), laparoscopic and open sigmoid resection, minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair, thyroid resection and pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD). Patients with private insurance were excluded. The detailed sub-steps were documented as well as the reason why these were not performed. In addition, an online survey regarding the sub-step concept was performed before and after the study.

resultsIn total, 21 centers included 2969 surgical procedures in 2018 for final analyses. While 24.4% of the procedures were performed by residents, sub-steps were performed in 22.2%. LCHE was most often performed completely by residents (43.3%), and PPPD revealed the highest rate of performed sub-steps (43.3%). Reasons for not assisting sub-steps to residents were often organizational and other reasons. After an initial increase, the number of performed sub-steps decreased significantly during the second half of the survey. The opinion survey revealed a high importance of the sub-step concept. The number of resident procedures was overestimated, and the number of performed sub-steps was underestimated. After the study, these estimations were more realistic.

conclusionEven though the sub-step practice concept is considered highly important for surgical education, it needs to be put into practice more consequently. The current data suggest a low participation of surgical residents in the operating room, although the participating hospitals are most likely highly interested in surgical education, hence their voluntary participation. Conceptual changes and a control of surgical education are needed.

Indexed as

Internship and ResidencyAdultCholecystectomy, LaparoscopicClinical CompetenceCurriculumEducation, Medical, GraduateFemaleGermanyHernia, InguinalHumansLaparoscopyMaleOperating RoomsProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID32355988
PMCPMC7326792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.