ArticleEndoscopy international open2020
Uptake and barriers for implementation of the resect and discard strategy: an international survey.
Article in Endoscopy international open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- A "resect and discard" strategy with risk-stratified management based on polyp diameter, number, and resection history.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Resect and Retrieve Colorectal Polyps: Time for New Insights.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Dysplasia and Malignancy in Colonic Polyps: Preparing for a Resect and Discard Strategy in Canada.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025Article
- White light computer-aided optical diagnosis of diminutive colorectal polyps in routine clinical practice.Endoscopy international open · 2024Article
- Evaluating the Efficacy of Resect-and-Discard and Resect-and-Retrieve Strategies for Diminutive Colonic Polyps.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
- Computer-aided polyp characterization in colonoscopy: sufficient performance or not?Clinical endoscopy · 2024Review
- Third Eye? The Assistance of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the Endoscopy of Gastrointestinal Neoplasms.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- The effectiveness of real-time computer-aided and quality control systems in colorectal adenoma and polyp detection during colonoscopies: a meta-analysis.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2023Article
- Non-optical polyp-based resect and discard strategy: A prospective clinical study.World journal of gastroenterology · 2022Article
- Artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy: A review of current state of practice and research.World journal of gastroenterology · 2021Review
- Resect and discard: Is it ready or time to shift gear?Endoscopy international open · 2020Article
- Current and future implications of artificial intelligence in colonoscopy.Annals of gastroenterologyReview
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.