Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32355871›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)2020

Prescription patterns of antidementives in a high income country: A pharmacoepidemiologic study.

Raphael Wurm, Tanja Stamm, Berthold Reichardt, Felix Schwarz, Tandis Parvizi, Sara Silvaieh, Theresa König, Hakan Cetin, Elisabeth Stögmann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Anti-dementia drugs: a descriptive study of the prescription pattern in Italy.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Raphael WurmDepartment of Neurology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria.
Tanja StammCenter for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria.
Berthold ReichardtSickness Fund Burgenland Siegfried-Marcus-Straße 5 Eisenstadt Austria.
Felix SchwarzDepartment of Neurology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria.
Tandis ParviziDepartment of Neurology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria.
Sara SilvaiehDepartment of Neurology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria.
Theresa KönigDepartment of Neurology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria.
Hakan CetinDepartment of Neurology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria.
Elisabeth StögmannDepartment of Neurology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria.
Medical University of Vienna · ATFonds Gesundes Österreich · ATStatistics Austria · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDementia is a leading and growing cause of morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to investigate real-world prescription patterns of antidementive medication in one of the largest cohorts published thus far to optimize use in this growing population.

methodsPrescription claims from 2005 to 2016 were provided by Austrian sickness funds, covering 98% of the population of Austria. Patients treated with at least one of the four approved antidementive drugs (ADDs) were included. Prescription prevalence was calculated for 2014 and 2015, and prescription patterns were traced on an individual level during the entire study period.

resultsA total of 127,896 patients were treated with an ADD between 2005 and 2016. The prevalence was 0.93% in 2014 and 1% in 2015. The median age at initiation of treatment was 82.3 years, and 65% were female. Initial therapy was a cholinesterase inhibitor (ChEI) in 80% and memantine in 20%. The median duration of therapy was 13.3 months. Eighteen percent of patients switched medication: two thirds to receive memantine, and one third to a different cholinesterase inhibitor. More than 26% discontinued treatment early.

conclusionWe find that discontinuation of ADDs is more frequent than switching; memantine is a common starting drug and age at the start of treatment is rather high in this population. Interpretation should be cautious, but the data may suggest that treatment guidelines are followed inconsistently. Appropriate provision of the available options should be emphasized to optimize cognitive survival, comorbidity, quality of life, and health care expenditures.

Indexed as

Alzheimer's diseasecholinesterase inhibitorsdementiaepidemiologymemantinepharmacoepidemiologyprescription patterns

Identifiers

PMID32355871
PMCPMC7189407
OpenAlexW3023011473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.