ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2020
X-linked dominant protoporphyria in a Chinese pedigree reveals a four-based deletion of
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- High-Frequency and Ultra-High-Frequency Ultrasound in Dermatologic Diseases and Aesthetic Medicine.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- An Extended C-Terminus, the Possible Culprit for Differential Regulation of 5-Aminolevulinate Synthase Isoforms.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundX-linked dominant protoporphyria (XLDPP) is a rare, hereditary disorder that leads to hepatobiliary and hematologic abnormalities including increased erythrocyte protoporphyrin, cutaneous photosensitivity, and decreased iron stores that is caused by a pathogenic mutation of
methodsThis study aimed to confirm the existence of XLDPP in a Chinese pedigree. We observed and described the dermatoscopic findings of this disorder under dermoscopy, and assessed photo damage in XLDPP patients using the Fotofinder system and very high frequency (VHF) skin ultrasonic system. We performed next generation sequencing and Sanger sequencing to detect and confirm genetic variants in DNA samples from the XLDPP family. Moreover, we monitored the hepatobiliary function as well as hematologic changes in related family members.
resultsAs compared to unaffected control subjects, patients exhibited evidence of severe cutaneous photodamage, causing photoaging, an increase in the size of the gallbladder, increased levels of protoporphyrin in red blood cells, an increase in blood levels of uroporphyrin and hematoporphyrin, and iron deficiency.
conclusionsXLDPP was validated by the identification of a four-base-pair deletion (c.1706_1709delAGTG, p.E569fs) in
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.