Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32355767›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2020

Prehypertension and risk for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality by diabetes status: results from the national health and nutrition examination surveys.

Yu-Qing Huang, Lin Liu, Jia-Yi Huang, Kenneth Lo, Chao-Lei Chen, Yu-Ling Yu, Jie Li, Ying-Qing Feng

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Predictors of 5-year Survival of Elderly with Hypertension. A Prospective Cohort Study.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Yu-Qing HuangDepartment of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Lin LiuDepartment of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Jia-Yi HuangDepartment of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Kenneth LoDepartment of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Chao-Lei ChenDepartment of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Yu-Ling YuDepartment of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Jie LiDepartment of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Ying-Qing FengDepartment of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital · CNBrown University · USGuangdong Academy of Medical Sciences · CNSouth China University of Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is unclear whether prehypertension alone or combined with diabetes associate with a higher risk for cardiovascular or all-cause mortality. The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between prehypertension and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality stratified by diabetes status.

methodsAll participants aged ≥18 years were enrolled from the 1999-2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES). Prehypertension was defined as systolic/diastolic blood pressure (BP): 120-139/80-89 mmHg. The status of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality of participants were followed up through 31 December 2015. We performed Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan-Meier survival curves to evaluate the relationships as mentioned above.

resultsIn general, we enrolled 26,070 participants while 15,295 (58.67%) of them did not have diabetes nor prehypertension, 8,870 (34.02%) had prehypertension alone, 835 (3.20%) had diabetes alone, and 1,070 (4.11%) had both diabetes and prehypertension. Compared with participants without diabetes nor prehypertension, the multivariable adjusted hazard ratios and 95% confidence interval (CI) for all-cause mortality among participants with prehypertension alone, diabetes alone, and both diabetes and prehypertension were 1.08 (95% CI: 0.95, 1.23), 1.26 (0.98, 1.62), and 1.67 (1.38, 2.03) (P for trend <0.001), for cardiovascular mortality, the corresponding hazard ratios and 95% CI were 1.40 (95% CI: 0.92, 2.14), 2.21 (1.12, 4.38), and 2.87 (1.65, 4.99) (P for trend <0.001) respectively.

conclusionsOur findings suggested that prehypertension associated with an increased risk for cardiovascular and all-cause mortality when compared with diabetes, but not for prehypertension alone. Early screening and intervention for BP among diabetic patients may be beneficial.

Indexed as

all-cause mortalitycardiovascular mortalitydiabetesPrehypertension

Identifiers

PMID32355767
PMCPMC7186679
OpenAlexW3009427029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.