Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32355649›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2020

Focus on the annuloplasty in aortic valve repair: implications from a quantitative multislice computed tomography analysis.

Niklas Neumann, Johannes Petersen, Christoph Sinning, Tatiana Sequeira-Gross, Niklas Schofer, Hermann Reichenspurner, Evaldas Girdauskas

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Aortic regurgitation: A multimodality approach.Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Niklas NeumannDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Johannes PetersenDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Christoph SinningDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Tatiana Sequeira-GrossDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Niklas SchoferDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Hermann ReichenspurnerDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Evaldas GirdauskasDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Cardiovascular Research Center · BRUniversität Hamburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAortic valve (AV) repair has evolved towards a treatment alternative in young patients with AV regurgitation and was accompanied by the development of surgical repair strategies. An efficient and reproducible AV annulus stabilization (i.e., annuloplasty) has been proposed as a crucial component to obtain the long-term stability of AV repair. However, there is still major controversy regarding the most appropriate annuloplasty approach. We aimed to address AV annulus structures which are relevant for AV annuloplasty, based on MS-CT data.

methodsWe retrospectively analysed 326 consecutive patients with AV disease who all underwent preprocedural MS-CT examination. Study cohort was subdivided according to the underlying AV pathology: 25 patients with aortic regurgitation (AR subgroup) (mean age 73±11 years, 68% male), 243 patients with aortic stenosis (AS subgroup) (73±11 years, 68% male) and 58 patients with normally functioning AV (normal AV subgroup) (mean age 76±7 years, 36% male). We systematically measured maximum and minimum AV annulus diameter, AV annular area, projected AV annular perimeter and anatomic AV annular perimeter during mid-systole using MS-CT data. Based on these measurements, AV annular eccentricity index was calculated [(max AV annulus × 100/min AV annulus) - 100]. Furthermore, we assessed the tissue components of AV annular plane, distinguishing between muscular and fibrous portions of the basal ring.

resultsAV annular eccentricity index was significantly larger in the normal AV-subgroup as compared to the AR-subgroup (33.2%±10.7%

conclusionsMS-CT enables a quantitative analysis of aortic root anatomy which may have an impact on AV annuloplasty. AR patients differ significantly regarding their AV annular dimensions and basal ring morphology as compared to the AS patients and those with a normal AV function. These findings may have major implications in tricuspid AV repair when designing the most appropriate AV annulus stabilisation technique.

Indexed as

annuloplastyAortic valve (AV)aortic valve repairmultislice computed tomography

Identifiers

PMID32355649
PMCPMC7188605
OpenAlexW3014375803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.