ArticleInternational journal of spine surgery2020
VAST Clinical Trial: Safely Supplementing Tissue Lost to Degenerative Disc Disease.
Article in International journal of spine surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03709901 (Viable Allograft Supplemented Disc Regeneration in the Treatment of Patients With Low Back Pain With or Without Intervertebral Disc Herniation - VAST Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Viable Allograft Supplemented Disc Regeneration in the Treatment of Patients With Low Back Pain With or Without Intervertebral Disc Herniation - VAST Trial
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effectiveness of intradiscal corticosteroid injection for the treatment of chronic discovertebral low back pain: a systematic review.Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.) · 2024Pooled it
- Intervertebral disc degeneration.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026Review
- Cell-based therapies for intervertebral disc degeneration: Navigating the path from promise to clinical reality.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2026Review
- Regenerative strategies for intervertebral disc degeneration.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2025Review
- Biologic Therapies for Discogenic Pain.Current pain and headache reports · 2025Review
- Stem cell-based strategies for intervertebral disc regeneration in degenerative microenvironments: challenges and solutions.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
- A Primer on Anatomy, Biophysics, Pathology, Imaging and Treatment of the Intervertebral Disc and the Anterior Spinal Column: The Discogenic, Intervertebral, Spinal Column (DISC) ASPN Workgroup.Journal of pain research · 2025Article
- Injectable Radiopaque Hyaluronic Acid Granular Hydrogels for Intervertebral Disc Repair.Advanced healthcare materials · 2024Article
- Perspective on Intradiscal Therapies for Lumbar Discogenic Pain: State of the Science, Knowledge Gaps, and Imperatives for Clinical Adoption.Journal of pain research · 2024Article
- Comprehensive narrative review on the analysis of outcomes from cell transplantation clinical trials for discogenic low back pain.North American Spine Society journal · 2023Article
- Application of stem cells in the repair of intervertebral disc degeneration.Stem cell research & therapy · 2022Review
- Clinical Development of Regenerative Medicine Targeted for Intervertebral Disc Disease.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Review
- The American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) Evidence-Based Clinical Guideline of Interventional Treatments for Low Back Pain.Journal of pain research · 2022Review
- Cell-based strategies for IVD repair: clinical progress and translational obstacles.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe function of the intervertebral disc is structural. Loss of tissue alters biomechanics, leads to subsequent disc degeneration, and is attributable to discogenic pain. A viable structural allograft was delivered into degenerate discs to determine whether intervention could safely stabilize anatomy, reduce pain, and improve function.
methodsFollowing institutional review board approval and patient consent, subjects were randomized to receive allograft or saline at either 1 or 2 levels or continue nonsurgical management (NSM). Data were collected at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months. Back pain with a visual analog scale (VAS) and disability by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were assessed, as were adverse events. This trial is registered on http://www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03709901).
resultsAt 6 and 12 months, the VAS improved from 54.81, 55.25, and 62.255 in the allograft, saline, and NSM subjects, respectively, to 16.0 and 41.0 in the allograft and saline groups at 6 months, and 12.27 and 19.67, respectively, at 12 months. All subjects in the NSM cohort crossed over to allograft treatment. At 6 and 12 months, ODI improved from 53.73, 49.25, and 55.75 in the allograft, saline, and NSM subjects, respectively, to 18.47 and 28.75 in the allograft and saline groups 1 and 2 at 6 months, and 15.67 and 9.33, respectively, at 12 months. At 3 months the ODI of the NSM group was 62.75 and subjects reached 19.0 and 11.0 at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Adverse events were transient and resolved in all cohorts.
conclusionsThis study is supported by data demonstrating that improved pain and function at 12 months can be attained with a supplemental viable disc matrix. Subjects receiving the VIA Disc Matrix achieved improvements that were durable at 12 months. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Initial assessments indicate that a 1-level or 2-level treatment offers a reliable intervention that is safe and beneficial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.