Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32355632›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of spine surgery2020

VAST Clinical Trial: Safely Supplementing Tissue Lost to Degenerative Disc Disease.

Douglas P Beall, Gregory L Wilson, Randolph Bishop, William Tally

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of spine surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03709901 (Viable Allograft Supplemented Disc Regeneration in the Treatment of Patients With Low Back Pain With or Without Intervertebral Disc Herniation - VAST Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03709901 naunknown statusnot on this map

Viable Allograft Supplemented Disc Regeneration in the Treatment of Patients With Low Back Pain With or Without Intervertebral Disc Herniation - VAST Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorVIVEX Biologics, Inc.Ran2017 to 2022Enrolled218ConditionsDegenerative Disc DiseaseArmsActive Allograft, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Intervertebral disc degeneration.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Regenerative strategies for intervertebral disc degeneration.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2025
    Review
  5. Biologic Therapies for Discogenic Pain.Current pain and headache reports · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Douglas P BeallSummit Medical Center, Edmond, Oklahoma.
Gregory L WilsonInvictus Healthcare, Tulsa, Oklahoma.
Randolph BishopNeurological and Spine Institute, Savannah, Georgia.
William TallyAthens Orthopaedic Clinic, Athens, Georgia.
Athens Orthopedic Clinic · USCarolina Neurosurgery and Spine Associates · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe function of the intervertebral disc is structural. Loss of tissue alters biomechanics, leads to subsequent disc degeneration, and is attributable to discogenic pain. A viable structural allograft was delivered into degenerate discs to determine whether intervention could safely stabilize anatomy, reduce pain, and improve function.

methodsFollowing institutional review board approval and patient consent, subjects were randomized to receive allograft or saline at either 1 or 2 levels or continue nonsurgical management (NSM). Data were collected at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months. Back pain with a visual analog scale (VAS) and disability by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were assessed, as were adverse events. This trial is registered on http://www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03709901).

resultsAt 6 and 12 months, the VAS improved from 54.81, 55.25, and 62.255 in the allograft, saline, and NSM subjects, respectively, to 16.0 and 41.0 in the allograft and saline groups at 6 months, and 12.27 and 19.67, respectively, at 12 months. All subjects in the NSM cohort crossed over to allograft treatment. At 6 and 12 months, ODI improved from 53.73, 49.25, and 55.75 in the allograft, saline, and NSM subjects, respectively, to 18.47 and 28.75 in the allograft and saline groups 1 and 2 at 6 months, and 15.67 and 9.33, respectively, at 12 months. At 3 months the ODI of the NSM group was 62.75 and subjects reached 19.0 and 11.0 at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Adverse events were transient and resolved in all cohorts.

conclusionsThis study is supported by data demonstrating that improved pain and function at 12 months can be attained with a supplemental viable disc matrix. Subjects receiving the VIA Disc Matrix achieved improvements that were durable at 12 months. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Initial assessments indicate that a 1-level or 2-level treatment offers a reliable intervention that is safe and beneficial.

Indexed as

back paindisc degenerationsupplemental disc allograftviable disc matrix

Identifiers

PMID32355632
PMCPMC7188098
OpenAlexW3016628545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.