Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32355566›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2020

Study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled feasibility trial evaluating personalised care planning for older people with frailty: PROSPER V2 27/11/18.

Anne Heaven, Peter Bower, Bonnie Cundill, Amanda Farrin, Marilyn Foster, Robbie Foy, Suzanne Hartley, Rebecca Hawkins, Claire Hulme, Sara Humphrey and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Behaviour change techniques in personalised care planning for older people: a systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Anne Heaven1Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, University of Leeds, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, BD9 6RJ UK.
Peter Bower2NIHR Older People and Frailty Policy Research Unit, Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL UK.
Bonnie Cundill3Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research (LICTR), Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT UK.
Amanda Farrin3Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research (LICTR), Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT UK.
Marilyn Foster1Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, University of Leeds, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, BD9 6RJ UK.
Robbie Foy4Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT UK.
Suzanne Hartley3Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research (LICTR), Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT UK.
Rebecca Hawkins1Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, University of Leeds, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, BD9 6RJ UK.
Claire Hulme5Health Economics Group, Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter, Exeter, LU EX1 2 UK.
Sara HumphreySpeciality Clinical Lead Older People Bradford District & Craven CCGs Scorex House West, 1 Bolton Rd, Bradford, BD1 4AS UK.
Rebecca Lawton7School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT UK.
Catriona Parker3Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research (LICTR), Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT UK.
Neil Pendleton8University of Manchester, Salford Royal Hospitals NHS Trust, Stott Lane, Salford, Greater Manchester M6 8HD UK.
Robert West4Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT UK.
John Young1Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, University of Leeds, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, BD9 6RJ UK.
Andrew Clegg1Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, University of Leeds, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, BD9 6RJ UK.
University of Leeds · GBBradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBSalford Royal Hospital · GBUniversity of Exeter · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-0216-20003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFrailty is characterised by increased vulnerability to falls, disability, hospitalisation and care home admission. However, it is relatively reversible in the early stages. Older people living with frailty often have multiple health and social issues which are difficult to address but could benefit from proactive, person-centred care. Personalised care planning aims to improve outcomes through better self-management, care coordination and access to community resources.

methodsThis feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial aims to recruit 400 participants from 11 general practice clusters across Bradford and Leeds in the north of England. Eligible patients will be aged over 65 with an electronic frailty index score of 0.21 (identified via their electronic health record), living in their own homes, without severe cognitive impairment and not in receipt of end of life care. After screening for eligible patients, a restricted 1:1 cluster-level randomisation will be used to allocate practices to the PROSPER intervention, which will be delivered over 12 weeks by a personal independence co-ordinator worker, or usual care. Following initial consent, participants will complete a baseline questionnaire in their own home including measures of health-related quality of life, activities of daily living, depression and health and social care resource use. Follow-up will be at six and 12 months. Feasibility outcomes relate to progression criteria based around recruitment, intervention delivery, retention and follow-up. An embedded process evaluation will contribute to iterative intervention optimisation and logic model development by examining staff training, intervention implementation and contextual factors influencing delivery and uptake of the intervention. DISCUSSION: Whilst personalised care planning can improve outcomes in long-term conditions, implementation in routine settings is poor. We will evaluate the feasibility of conducting a cluster randomised controlled trial of personalised care planning in a community population based on frailty status. Key objectives will be to test fidelity of trial design, gather data to refine sample size calculation for the planned definitive trial, optimise data collection processes and optimise the intervention including training and delivery.

trial registrationISRCTN12363970 - 08/11/18.

Indexed as

ClustereFIFrailtyOlder peoplePersonalised care planningQuality of lifeRCT

Identifiers

PMID32355566
PMCPMC7187486
OpenAlexW3023885998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.