Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32355292›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Exploring the fitness benefits of genome reduction in Escherichia coli by a selection-driven approach.

Viktor Vernyik, Ildikó Karcagi, Edit Tímár, István Nagy, Ádám Györkei, Balázs Papp, Zsuzsanna Györfy, György Pósfai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. PHAGE (New Rochelle, N.Y.) · 2023
    Article
  7. Comparative Genomics ofPHAGE (New Rochelle, N.Y.) · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Viktor VernyikInstitute of Biochemistry, Biological Research Centre, Szeged, 6726, Hungary.
Ildikó KarcagiInstitute of Biochemistry, Biological Research Centre, Szeged, 6726, Hungary.
Edit TímárInstitute of Biochemistry, Biological Research Centre, Szeged, 6726, Hungary.
István NagyInstitute of Biochemistry, Biological Research Centre, Szeged, 6726, Hungary.
Ádám GyörkeiInstitute of Biochemistry, Biological Research Centre, Szeged, 6726, Hungary.
Balázs PappInstitute of Biochemistry, Biological Research Centre, Szeged, 6726, Hungary.
Zsuzsanna GyörfyInstitute of Biochemistry, Biological Research Centre, Szeged, 6726, Hungary. gyorfy.zsuzsanna@brc.hu.
György PósfaiInstitute of Biochemistry, Biological Research Centre, Szeged, 6726, Hungary. posfai.gyorgy@brc.hu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial simplification of bacterial genomes is thought to have the potential to yield cells with reduced complexity, enhanced genetic stability, and improved cellular economy. Of these goals, economical gains, supposedly due to the elimination of superfluous genetic material, and manifested in elevated growth parameters in selected niches, have not yet been convincingly achieved. This failure might stem from limitations of the targeted genome reduction approach that assumes full knowledge of gene functions and interactions, and allows only a limited number of reduction trajectories to interrogate. To explore the potential fitness benefits of genome reduction, we generated successive random deletions in E. coli by a novel, selection-driven, iterative streamlining process. The approach allows the exploration of multiple streamlining trajectories, and growth periods inherent in the procedure ensure selection of the fittest variants of the population. By generating single- and multiple-deletion strains and reconstructing the deletions in the parental genetic background, we showed that favourable deletions can be obtained and accumulated by the procedure. The most reduced multiple-deletion strain, obtained in five deletion cycles (2.5% genome reduction), outcompeted the wild-type, and showed elevated biomass yield. The spectrum of advantageous deletions, however, affecting only a few genomic regions, appears to be limited.

Indexed as

Escherichia coliGene DeletionGenome, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID32355292
PMCPMC7193553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.