Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32355257›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

Endemism patterns are scale dependent.

Barnabas H Daru, Harith Farooq, Alexandre Antonelli, Søren Faurby

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Establishing new grid-size-dependent attributes to rank areas of endemism for conservation priorities.Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. The impact of taxonomic change on the Amazonian palm flora.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Climatic stability and geological history shape global centers of neo- and paleoendemism in seed plants.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Barnabas H DaruDepartment of Life Sciences, Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, Corpus Christi, 78412, TX, USA. barnabas.daru@tamucc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2115-0257
Harith FarooqDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, SE 405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Alexandre AntonelliDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, SE 405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1842-9297
Søren FaurbyDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, SE 405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2974-2628

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Areas of endemism are important in biogeography because they capture facets of biodiversity not represented elsewhere. However, the scales at which they are relevant to research and conservation are poorly analysed. Here, we calculate weighted endemism (WE) and phylogenetic endemism (PE) separately for all birds and amphibians across the globe. We show that scale dependence is widespread for both indices and manifests across grain sizes, spatial extents and taxonomic treatments. Variations in taxonomic opinions-whether species are treated by systematic 'lumping' or 'splitting'-can profoundly affect the allocation of WE hotspots. Global patterns of PE can provide insights into complex evolutionary processes but this congruence is lost at the continental to country extents. These findings are explained by environmental heterogeneity at coarser grains, and to a far lesser extent at finer resolutions. Regardless of scale, we find widespread deficits of protection for endemism hotspots. Our study presents a framework for assessing areas for conservation that are robust to assumptions on taxonomy, spatial grain and extent.

Indexed as

BiodiversityPhylogenyAmphibiansAnimalsBiological EvolutionBirdsClassificationConservation of Natural ResourcesGeographyLinear ModelsPopulation DynamicsSpecies SpecificityTemperature

Identifiers

PMID32355257
PMCPMC7192928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.