Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32355219›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of impotence research2020

Inflatable penile prosthesis cylinders out of place during implantation.

Steven K Wilson, Jay Simhan, Rafael Carrion

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of impotence research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Surgical tips in difficult penile prosthetic surgery: a narrative review.International journal of impotence research · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Steven K WilsonDepartment of Urology, Institute for Urologic Excellence, Indio, CA, USA. skwilson@mac.com.
Jay SimhanDepartment of Urology, Einstein Healthcare Network, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Rafael CarrionDepartment of Urology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
Einstein Healthcare Network · USUniversity of South Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is safe to say that the overwhelming majority of cylinders out of place result from surgeon error at the time of implantation. There are some instances where patient comorbidities could increase the difficulty of accurate development of cylinder insertion or space. Most of the time the operator recognizes his instrument out of place and corrects it intraoperatively. Other times the surgeon makes a flawed movement with a sharp instrument piercing some tissue. When the cylinder is placed initially and inflated the wayward position is usually not evident. However, in the postoperative period, the inaccurate position of the cylinder(s) can become readily apparent. The reader will notice this repeatedly stressed in Wilson's Workshop-over 90% of cylinders that are out of position can be diagnosed or prevented if one utilizes the two safety checks outlined below.

Indexed as

Penile ImplantationPenile ProsthesisErectile DysfunctionHumansMaleProsthesis Design

Identifiers

PMID32355219
OpenAlexW3022530695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.