ArticleIn vivo (Athens, Greece)
Estimating the Lifespan of Elderly Patients With Cerebral Metastases from Kidney Cancer.
Article in In vivo (Athens, Greece). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimOutcomes of elderly patients with cerebral metastases from kidney cancer may be improved by personalized treatment. A scoring instrument for estimating survival in these patients is presented. PATIENTS AND
methodsTwenty-four elderly kidney cancer patients receiving whole-brain irradiation (WBI) were retrospectively investigated. WBI-regimen and six pre-treatment factors were evaluated including age, gender, performance score, number of cerebral metastases, extracranial metastases and time from kidney cancer diagnosis to WBI.
resultsNumber of cerebral metastases (p=0.194) and time from kidney cancer diagnosis to WBI (p=0.107) correlated with survival and were included in the instrument. Based on these factors, patient scores of 0, 1 and 2 points resulted in 6-month survival rates of 0%, 15% and 60% (p=0.131), respectively. Two groups were designed, 0-1 and 2 points, with 6-month survival rates of 11% and 60% (p=0.108), respectively.
conclusionThis new instrument can assist physicians aiming to estimate a patient's survival prognosis to provide personalized treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.