Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32354454›Full record

ReviewHeart rhythm2020

Deep learning for comprehensive ECG annotation.

Benjamin A Teplitzky, Michael McRoberts, Hamid Ghanbari

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heart rhythm, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Episodes of Atrial Fibrillation and Symptoms: A Temporal Analysis.Cardiovascular digital health journal · 2023
    Article
  11. Current and Future Use of Artificial Intelligence in Electrocardiography.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. How to use digital devices to detect and manage arrhythmias: an EHRA practical guide.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Benjamin A TeplitzkyPreventice Solutions, Inc, Rochester, Minnesota. Electronic address: bteplitzky@preventice.com.
Michael McRobertsPreventice Solutions, Inc, Rochester, Minnesota.
Hamid GhanbariUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Funding

Novel Techniques for Evaluating and Assessing Symptoms, Affect. Heart Rhythm and Functional Status in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: miAfib ProjectK23HL135397 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI GHANBARI, HAMID · 2018 to 2022
$983k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL135397
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncreasing utilization of long-term outpatient ambulatory electrocardiographic (ECG) monitoring continues to drive the need for improved ECG interpretation algorithms.

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to describe the BeatLogic® platform for ECG interpretation and to validate the platform using electrophysiologist-adjudicated real-world data and publicly available validation data.

methodsDeep learning models were trained to perform beat and rhythm detection/classification using ECGs collected with the Preventice BodyGuardian® Heart monitor. Training annotations were created by certified ECG technicians, and validation annotations were adjudicated by a team of board-certified electrophysiologists. Deep learning model classification results were used to generate contiguous annotation results, and performance was assessed in accordance with the EC57 standard.

resultsOn the real-world validation dataset, BeatLogic beat detection sensitivity and positive predictive value were 99.84% and 99.78%, respectively. Ventricular ectopic beat classification sensitivity and positive predictive value were 89.4% and 97.8%, respectively. Episode and duration F

conclusionThe BeatLogic platform represents the next stage of advancement for algorithmic ECG interpretation. This comprehensive platform performs beat detection, beat classification, and rhythm detection/classification with greatly improved performance over the current state of the art, with comparable or improved performance over previously published algorithms that can accomplish only 1 of these 3 tasks.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDeep LearningSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedCardiac Complexes, PrematureElectrocardiographyHeart RateHumansMonitoring, PhysiologicPredictive Value of TestsArtificial intelligenceBeatLogicDeep learningElectrocardiographic interpretationPreventice Solutions

Identifiers

PMID32354454
PMCPMC9247885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.