Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32354355›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2020

Identifying opportunities to support patient-centred care for ductal carcinoma in situ: qualitative interviews with clinicians.

Bryanna B Nyhof, Frances C Wright, Nicole J Look Hong, Gary Groot, Lucy Helyer, Pamela Meiers, May Lynn Quan, Nancy N Baxter, Robin Urquhart, Rebecca Warburton and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Bryanna B NyhofToronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5G2C4, Canada. Anna.gagliardi@uhnresearch.ca.
Frances C WrightSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Nicole J Look HongSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Gary GrootUniversity of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Lucy HelyerDalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.
Pamela MeiersUniversity of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
May Lynn QuanUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Nancy N BaxterSt Michael's Hospital Department of Surgery and Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Department of Surgery and the Institute for Health Policy Management and Evaluation, Toronto, Canada.
Robin UrquhartDalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.
Rebecca WarburtonUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Anna R GagliardiToronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5G2C4, Canada.

Funding

Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute 704890
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWomen with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) report poor patient-clinician communication, and long-lasting confusion and anxiety about their treatment and prognosis. Research shows that patient-centred care (PCC) improves patient experience and outcomes. Little is known about the clinician experience of delivering PCC for DCIS. This study characterized communication challenges faced by clinicians, and interventions they need to improve PCC for DCIS.

methodsPurposive and snowball sampling were used to recruit Canadian clinicians by specialty, gender, years of experience, setting, and geographic location. Qualitative interviews were conducted by telephone. Data were analyzed using constant comparison. Findings were mapped to a cancer-specific, comprehensive PCC framework to identify opportunities for improvement.

resultsClinicians described approaches they used to address the PCC domains of fostering a healing relationship, exchanging information, and addressing emotions, but do not appear to be addressing the domains of managing uncertainty, involving women in making decisions, or enabling self-management. However, many clinicians described challenges or variable practices for all PCC domains but fostering a healing relationship. Clinicians vary in describing DCIS as cancer based on personal beliefs. When exchanging information, most find it difficult to justify treatment while assuring women of a good prognosis, and feel frustrated when women remain confused despite their efforts to explain it. While they recognize confusion and anxiety among women, clinicians said that patient navigators, social workers, support groups and high-quality information specific to DCIS are lacking. Despite these challenges, clinicians said they did not need or want communication interventions.

conclusionsFindings represent currently unmet opportunities by which to help clinicians enhance PCC for DCIS, and underscore the need for supplemental information and supportive care specific to DCIS. Future research is needed to develop and test communication interventions that improve PCC for DCIS. If effective and widely implemented, this may contribute to improved care experiences and outcomes for women diagnosed with and treated for DCIS.

Indexed as

Decision MakingAttitude of Health PersonnelBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansPatient-Centered CarePatient ParticipationProfessional-Patient RelationsQualitative ResearchQuality of Health CareSurveys and QuestionnairesCommunicationDecision-makingDuctal carcinoma in situPatient-centred care

Identifiers

PMID32354355
PMCPMC7191683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.