Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32354144›Full record

ArticleNutrients2020

Hospital Regimens Including Probiotics Guide the Individual Development of the Gut Microbiome of Very Low Birth Weight Infants in the First Two Weeks of Life.

Stefan Kurath-Koller, Charlotte Neumann, Christine Moissl-Eichinger, Raimund Kraschl, Claudia Kanduth, Barbara Hopfer, Manuela-Raluca Pausan, Berndt Urlesberger, Bernhard Resch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Early-Life Development of the Bifidobacterial Community in the Infant Gut.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Stefan Kurath-KollerDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of Graz, Austria Auenbruggerplatz 34/2, 8036 Graz, Austria.
Charlotte NeumannDiagnostic & Research Institute of Hygiene, Microbiology and Environmental Medicine, Medical University Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria.
Christine Moissl-EichingerDiagnostic & Research Institute of Hygiene, Microbiology and Environmental Medicine, Medical University Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria.
Raimund KraschlDepartment of Pediatrics, General Hospital Klagenfurt am Wörthersee, 9020 Klagenfurt, Austria.
Claudia KanduthDepartment of Pediatrics, General Hospital Klagenfurt am Wörthersee, 9020 Klagenfurt, Austria.
Barbara HopferDepartment of Pediatrics, General Hospital Hochsteiermark, 8700 Leoben, Austria.
Manuela-Raluca PausanDiagnostic & Research Institute of Hygiene, Microbiology and Environmental Medicine, Medical University Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria.
Berndt UrlesbergerDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of Graz, Austria Auenbruggerplatz 34/2, 8036 Graz, Austria.
Bernhard ReschDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of Graz, Austria Auenbruggerplatz 34/2, 8036 Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-4348-8299

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF DOC 31
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is unknown to what extent the microbiome of preterm infants is influenced by hospital regimens including the use of different probiotics when it comes to the prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC).

methodsProspective controlled multicenter cohort study including very low birth weight infants from three neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) between October 2015 and March 2017. During this time span, stool was sampled every other day during the first two weeks and samples were subjected to amplicon-based microbiome analyses. Out of these, seventeen negative controls were processed (German Registry of Clinical Trials (No.: DRKS00009290)).

resultsThe groups (3 × 18 infants) showed no statistically significant difference regarding gestational age, birth weight, APGAR scores and oxygen demand. 2029 different taxa were detected, including

conclusionProbiotics proved to be safe and initiated an earlier increase of bacterial load (with marked individual divergences), which might play a crucial role in the prevention of neonatal morbidities. Meconium was found not to be free of bacterial DNA, and oral antibiotics did not influence the fecal microbiome development negatively, and hospital regimes led to a center-specific, distinct cluster formation.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeHospitalsInfant, Very Low Birth WeightBifidobacteriumEnterocolitis, NecrotizingFecesGestational AgeHumansLactobacillusProbioticsProspective StudiesTime Factorsfecal microbiomenecrotizing enterocolitispreterm infantpreventionprobiotics

Identifiers

PMID32354144
PMCPMC7281991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.