Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32353962›Full record

Trial reportNutrients2020

Circulating Ionized Magnesium as a Measure of Supplement Bioavailability: Results from a Pilot Study for Randomized Clinical Trial.

Jiada Zhan, Taylor C Wallace, Sarah J Butts, Sisi Cao, Velarie Ansu, Lisa A Spence, Connie M Weaver, Nana Gletsu-Miller

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nutrients, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04139928 (Bioavailability of Single-dose Magnesium Salts), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04139928 nacompletednot on this map

Bioavailability of Single-dose Magnesium Salts

TypeinterventionalSponsorThink Healthy Group, Inc.Ran2018 to 2020Enrolled17ConditionsBioavailabilityArmsPicometer-ionic form of magnesium chloride, Magnesium citrate or magnesium oxide, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jiada ZhanPublic Health Nutrition, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44106,USA.
Taylor C WallaceDepartment of Nutrition and Food Studies, George Mason University, MS1F7, 4400 University Drive,Fairfax, VA 22030, USA.
Sarah J ButtsDepartment of Nutrition Science, Purdue University, 700 West State Street, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Sisi CaoDepartment of Nutrition Science, Purdue University, 700 West State Street, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Velarie AnsuDepartment of Applied Health Science, School of Public Health, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.
Lisa A SpenceDepartment of Applied Health Science, School of Public Health, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.
Connie M WeaverWeaver and Associates Consulting, LLC, West Lafayette, IN 47906, USA.
Nana Gletsu-MillerDepartment of Applied Health Science, School of Public Health, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.

Funding

New Capstone, Inc. None
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral supplementation may improve the dietary intake of magnesium, which has been identified as a shortfall nutrient. We conducted a pilot study to evaluate appropriate methods for assessing responses to the ingestion of oral magnesium supplements, including ionized magnesium in whole blood (iMg

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsAdolescentAdultAgedBiological AvailabilityCross-Over StudiesEatingFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMagnesium ChlorideMaleMiddle AgedNutritional Physiological PhenomenaPilot ProjectsSingle-Blind MethodMagnesium ChloridebiomarkersdietiMgmagnesiumnutritional status

Identifiers

PMID32353962
PMCPMC7281967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.