Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32353821›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in immunology2020

Co-evolution of mutagenic genome editors and vertebrate adaptive immunity.

Inês Trancoso, Ryo Morimoto, Thomas Boehm

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in immunology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Inês TrancosoDepartment of Developmental Immunology, Max Planck Institute of Immunobiology and Epigenetics, 79108 Freiburg, Germany.
Ryo MorimotoDepartment of Developmental Immunology, Max Planck Institute of Immunobiology and Epigenetics, 79108 Freiburg, Germany.
Thomas BoehmDepartment of Developmental Immunology, Max Planck Institute of Immunobiology and Epigenetics, 79108 Freiburg, Germany. Electronic address: boehm@ie-freiburg.mpg.de.
Max Planck Institute of Immunobiology and Epigenetics · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The adaptive immune systems of all vertebrates rely on self-DNA mutating enzymes to assemble their antigen receptors in lymphocytes of their two principal lineages. In jawed vertebrates, the RAG1/2 recombinase directs V(D)J recombination of B cell and T cell receptor genes, whereas the activation-induced cytidine deaminase AID engages in their secondary modification. The recombination activating genes (RAG) 1 and 2 evolved from an ancient transposon-encoded genome modifier into a self-DNA mutator serving adaptive immunity; this was possible as a result of domestication, involving several changes in RAG1 and RAG2 proteins suppressing transposition and instead facilitating-coupled cleavage and recombination. By contrast, recent evidence supports the notion that the antigen receptors of T-like and B-like cells of jawless vertebrates, designated variable lymphocyte receptors (VLRs), are somatically assembled through a process akin to gene conversion that is believed to be dependent on the activities of distant relatives of AID, the cytidine deaminases CDA1 and CDA2, respectively. It appears, therefore, that the precursors of AID and CDAs underwent a domestication process that changed their target range from foreign nucleic acids to self-DNA; this multi-step evolutionary process ensured that the threat to host genome integrity was minimized. Here, we review recent findings illuminating the evolutionary steps associated with the domestication of the two groups of genome editors, RAG1/2 and cytidine deaminases, indicating how they became the driving forces underlying the emergence of vertebrate adaptive immune systems.

Indexed as

Gene EditingAdaptive ImmunityAnimalsCytidine DeaminaseDNA-Binding ProteinsHumansVertebratesCytidine DeaminaseDNA-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID32353821
PMCPMC7768089
OpenAlexW3019035692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.