Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32353742›Full record

ArticleMedical hypotheses2020

Vitamin D: A simpler alternative to tocilizumab for trial in COVID-19?

Morry Silberstein

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical hypotheses, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04394390 (Vitamin D Levels in SARS-CoV-2), which is not on this map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04394390 completednot on this map

Vitamin D Levels in SARS-CoV-2: Do Current Adequacy Thresholds Reflect Clinical Risk? Insights From a Large Turkish Cohort

TypeobservationalSponsorBursa City HospitalRan2020 to 2025Enrolled1,100ConditionsCOVID, Vitamin D DeficiencyArmsvitamin d
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Journal of molecular structure · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Vitamin D and COVID-19: It is time to act.International journal of clinical practice · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Morry SilbersteinSchool of Molecular and Life Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.
Curtin University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is anecdotal evidence that tocilizumab, an immunosuppressant drug, may be a potential therapeutic option for patients with severe manifestations of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Like tocilizumab, Vitamin D appears to modulate the activity of an interleukin (IL-6), which may explain the seasonal variation in prevalence of influenza. While most cases of COVID-19 have, thus far, occurred in the Northern Hemisphere winter, limiting the ability to assess seasonal variation, there remains substantial variation in the severity of this condition that has yet to be explained. A retrospective comparison of Vitamin D levels in previously obtained blood samples between survivors and confirmed fatalities could establish a rationale for implementation of widespread Vitamin D supplementation. This would be far cheaper and simpler than tocilizumab as a therapeutic option to trial.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBetacoronavirusClinical Trials as TopicCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19COVID-19 Drug TreatmentDietary SupplementsHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsInterleukin-6PandemicsPneumonia, ViralPrevalenceSARS-CoV-2Vitamin DVitamin D DeficiencyAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedIL6 protein, humanImmunosuppressive AgentsInterleukin-6tocilizumabVitamin D

Identifiers

PMID32353742
PMCPMC7177149
OpenAlexW3018393365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.