Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32353465›Full record

ReviewExperimental neurology2020

Learning to promote recovery after spinal cord injury.

James W Grau, Rachel E Baine, Paris A Bean, Jacob A Davis, Gizelle N Fauss, Melissa K Henwood, Kelsey E Hudson, David T Johnston, Megan M Tarbet, Misty M Strain

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Exosomes derived from CD271Theranostics · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Behavioral studies of spinal conditioning: The spinal cord is smarter than you think it is.Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

James W GrauBehavioral and Cellular Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA. Electronic address: j-grau@tamu.edu.
Rachel E BaineBehavioral and Cellular Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Paris A BeanBehavioral and Cellular Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Jacob A DavisBehavioral and Cellular Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Gizelle N FaussBehavioral and Cellular Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Melissa K HenwoodBehavioral and Cellular Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Kelsey E HudsonBehavioral and Cellular Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
David T JohnstonBehavioral and Cellular Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Megan M TarbetBehavioral and Cellular Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Misty M StrainBattlefield Pain Research, U.S. Army Institute of Surgical Research, 3698 Chambers Pass, BHT-1, BSA Fort Sam Houston, TX 78234, USA.

Funding

Nociceptive input after spinal cord injury (SCI) expands the region of secondary injury and undermines long-term recoveryR01NS104422 · NINDS · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY · PI GRAU, JAMES WILLIAM · 2018 to 2022
$1.5M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS104422NINDS NIH HHS R56 NS104422
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present review explores the concept of learning within the context of neurorehabilitation after spinal cord injury (SCI). The aim of physical therapy and neurorehabilitation is to bring about a lasting change in function-to encourage learning. Traditionally, it was assumed that the adult spinal cord is hardwired-immutable and incapable of learning. Research has shown that neurons within the lower (lumbosacral) spinal cord can support learning after communication with the brain has been disrupted by means of a thoracic transection. Noxious stimulation can sensitize nociceptive circuits within the spinal cord, engaging signal pathways analogous to those implicated in brain-dependent learning and memory. After a spinal contusion injury, pain input can fuel hemorrhage, increase the area of tissue loss (secondary injury), and undermine long-term recovery. Neurons within the spinal cord are sensitive to environmental relations. This learning has a metaplastic effect that counters neural over-excitation and promotes adaptive learning through an up-regulation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). Exposure to rhythmic stimulation, treadmill training, and cycling also enhances the expression of BDNF and counters the development of nociceptive sensitization. SCI appears to enable plastic potential within the spinal cord by down-regulating the Cl

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansLearningNeuronal PlasticityRecovery of FunctionSpinal Cord InjuriesBDNFGABAIonic plasticityMetaplasticityNeurofunctionalismNociceptionPainRelational learningSensitizationTiming

Identifiers

PMID32353465
PMCPMC7282951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.