Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32353276›Full record

ArticleThe lancet. Psychiatry2020

Distinct and shared contributions of diagnosis and symptom domains to cognitive performance in severe mental illness in the Paisa population: a case-control study.

Susan K Service, Cristian Vargas Upegui, Mauricio Castaño Ramírez, Allison M Port, Tyler M Moore, Marfred Munoz Umanes, Luis Guillermo Agudelo Arango, Ana M Díaz-Zuluaga, Juanita Melo Espejo, María Cecilia López and 15 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The lancet. Psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Distinct neurocognitive profiles and clinical phenotypes associated with copy number variation at the 22q11.2 locus.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Susan K ServiceCenter for Neurobehavioral Genetics, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Cristian Vargas UpeguiDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Antioquía, Medellín, Colombia.
Mauricio Castaño RamírezDepartment of Mental Health and Human Behavior, University of Caldas, Manizales, Colombia.
Allison M PortDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Tyler M MooreDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Marfred Munoz UmanesCenter for Neurobehavioral Genetics, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Luis Guillermo Agudelo ArangoDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Antioquía, Medellín, Colombia.
Ana M Díaz-ZuluagaDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Antioquía, Medellín, Colombia.
Juanita Melo EspejoDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Antioquía, Medellín, Colombia.
María Cecilia LópezDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Antioquía, Medellín, Colombia.
Juan David PalacioDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Antioquía, Medellín, Colombia.
Sergio Ruiz SánchezDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Antioquía, Medellín, Colombia.
Johanna ValenciaDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Antioquía, Medellín, Colombia.
Terri M TeshibaCenter for Neurobehavioral Genetics, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Alesandra EspinozaCenter for Neurobehavioral Genetics, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Loes Olde LoohuisCenter for Neurobehavioral Genetics, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Juan De la Hoz GomezCenter for Neurobehavioral Genetics, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Benjamin B BrodeyTeleSage, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Chiara SabattiDepartments of Biomedical Data Science and Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Javier I EscobarDepartment of Psychiatry, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Victor I ReusDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Carlos Lopez JaramilloDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Antioquía, Medellín, Colombia.
Ruben C GurDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Carrie E BeardenCenter for Neurobehavioral Genetics, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Electronic address: cbearden@mednet.ucla.edu.
Nelson B FreimerCenter for Neurobehavioral Genetics, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Universidad de Antioquia · COUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USJohnson University · USStanford University · USTelesage (United States) · USUniversity of Caldas · COUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

UCLA Clinical Translational Science InstituteUL1TR001881 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ARLEEN F. BROWN, ARASH NAEIM · 2016 to 2026
$118.1M
Genetics of Severe Mental IllnessR01MH113078 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BEARDEN, CARRIE E, FREIMER, NELSON B. · 2017 to 2021
$5.8M
Bipolar Endophenotypes in Population IsolatesR01MH075007 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI FREIMER, NELSON B. · 2007 to 2011
$3.8M
Neurodevelopment and Psychosis in the 22q11.2 Copy Number VariantsR37MH085953 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI CARRIE E BEARDEN · 2023 to 2026
$2.9M
Genome Sequencing in Extended Bipolar PedigreesR01MH095454 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI FREIMER, NELSON B. · 2012 to 2014
$2.4M
Accelerating the Diagnosis of Bipolar Disorder Using Genetic and Phenotypic SignaturesR00MH116115 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI OLDE LOOHUIS, LOES MARLEIN · 2020 to 2022
$747k
Accelerating the diagnosis of bipolar disorder using genetic and phenotypic signaturesK99MH116115 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI OLDE LOOHUIS, LOES MARLEIN · 2018 to 2019
$257k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001881NIMH NIH HHS K99 MH116115NIMH NIH HHS R00 MH116115NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH075007NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH095454NIMH NIH HHS R01MH095454-02S1NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH113078NIMH NIH HHS R37 MH085953
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSevere mental illness diagnoses have overlapping symptomatology and shared genetic risk, motivating cross-diagnostic investigations of disease-relevant quantitative measures. We analysed relationships between neurocognitive performance, symptom domains, and diagnoses in a large sample of people with severe mental illness not ascertained for a specific diagnosis (cases), and people without mental illness (controls) from a single, homogeneous population.

methodsIn this case-control study, cases with severe mental illness were ascertained through electronic medical records at Clínica San Juan de Dios de Manizales (Manizales, Caldas, Colombia) and the Hospital Universitario San Vicente Fundación (Medellín, Antioquía, Colombia). Participants were assessed for speed and accuracy using the Penn Computerized Neurocognitive Battery (CNB). Cases had structured interview-based diagnoses of schizophrenia, bipolar 1, bipolar 2, or major depressive disorder. Linear mixed models, using CNB tests as repeated measures, modelled neurocognition as a function of diagnosis, sex, and all interactions. Follow-up analyses in cases included symptom factor scores obtained from exploratory factor analysis of symptom data as main effects.

findingsBetween Oct 1, 2017, and Nov 1, 2019, 2406 participants (1689 cases [schizophrenia n=160; bipolar 1 disorder n=519; bipolar 2 disorder n=204; and major depressive disorder n=806] and 717 controls; mean age 39 years (SD 14); and 1533 female) were assessed. Participants with bipolar 1 disorder and schizophrenia had similar impairments in accuracy and speed across cognitive domains. Participants with bipolar 2 disorder and major depressive disorder performed similarly to controls, with subtle deficits in executive and social cognition. A three-factor model (psychosis, mania, and depression) best represented symptom data. Controlling for diagnosis, premorbid IQ, and disease severity, high lifetime psychosis scores were associated with reduced accuracy and speed across cognitive domains, whereas high depression scores were associated with increased social cognition accuracy.

interpretationCross-diagnostic investigations showed that neurocognitive function in severe mental illness is characterised by two distinct profiles (bipolar 1 disorder and schizophrenia, and bipolar 2 disorder and major depressive disorder), and is associated with specific symptom domains. These results suggest the utility of this design for elucidating severe mental illness causes and trajectories.

fundingUS National Institute of Mental Health.

Indexed as

CognitionSchizophrenic PsychologyAdultBipolar DisorderCase-Control StudiesCognition DisordersColombiaFemaleHumansLinear ModelsMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32353276
PMCPMC7788266
OpenAlexW3020565153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.