Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32353211›Full record

ArticleACR open rheumatology2020

Medical Cannabis Use by Rheumatology Patients Following Recreational Legalization: A Prospective Observational Study of 1000 Patients in Canada.

Mary-Ann Fitzcharles, Emmanouil Rampakakis, John Sampalis, Yoram Shir, Martin Cohen, Michael Starr, Winfried Häuser

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACR open rheumatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The Elusive Truth of Cannabinoids for Rheumatic Pain.Current rheumatology reports · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Mary-Ann FitzcharlesMcGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1091-3175
Emmanouil RampakakisJSS Medical Research, St-Laurent, Quebec, Canada.
John SampalisJSS Medical Research, St-Laurent, Quebec, Canada, and Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Yoram ShirMcGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Martin CohenMcGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Michael StarrMcGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Winfried HäuserKlinikum Saarbrücken, Saarbrücken, Germany, and Technische Universität München, München, Germany.
McGill University Health Centre · CAJewish General Hospital · CAJSS Medical Research (India) · INKlinikum Saarbrücken · DE

Funding

Louise and Alan Edwards Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveRecreational legalization of cannabis may influence the medical use by patients. When only medical access was legally available in Canada, 4.3% of rheumatology patients reported use. With the current recreational legalization, we have reexamined the prevalence and characteristics of medical cannabis use in this same rheumatology setting.

methodsConsecutively attending rheumatology patients participated in an onsite survey comprising the following two questionnaires: 1) demographic and disease information completed by the rheumatologist and 2) patient anonymous questionnaire of health status, cannabis use (recreational and/or medicinal), and characteristics of cannabis use.

resultsOf 1047 attendees from June to August 2019, with 1000 participating, medical cannabis had been used by 12.6% of patients (95% confidence interval 10.7%-14.8%), with half continuing use for mostly pain relief. Discontinuation was due to lack of effect in 57% of patients and side effects in 28% of patients. Ever medical users were younger (61.2 vs. 64.9 years; P = 0.006), more likely unemployed/disabled (16.7% vs. 5.9%; P < 0.001), and had more previous (47.6% vs. 25.5%; P < 0.001) and current recreational cannabis use (17.5% vs. 3.1%; P < 0.001) than nonusers. Most patients used multiple methods of administration, including smoking, vaporizing, and using oral oil preparations, but were poorly knowledgeable of product content, which was bought solely via the legal medical route by only 20%, and only one-third disclosed their use to the rheumatologist.

conclusionMedical cannabis use has tripled for rheumatology patients since recreational legalization, with users being younger, not working, and having recreational cannabis experience. Concerning issues are the poor knowledge of the product being used, access via the nonmedical route, and nondisclosure to the physician.

Identifiers

PMID32353211
PMCPMC7231516
OpenAlexW3021069112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.