ArticleACR open rheumatology2020
Medical Cannabis Use by Rheumatology Patients Following Recreational Legalization: A Prospective Observational Study of 1000 Patients in Canada.
Article in ACR open rheumatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- The development of a cannabis risk assessment tool for patients with rheumatologic conditions: a Delphi study.Clinical rheumatology · 2026Article
- The Elusive Truth of Cannabinoids for Rheumatic Pain.Current rheumatology reports · 2024Review
- Evidence for the use of cannabis-based medicines in osteoarthritis: a scoping review.Clinical rheumatology · 2024Article
- Medicinal cannabis use among young adults during California's transition from legalized medical use to adult-use: a longitudinal analysis.The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse · 2024Article
- Cannabis and Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Scoping Review Evaluating the Benefits, Risks, and Future Research Directions.Rambam Maimonides medical journal · 2023Article
- Medicinal Cannabis Use for Rheumatic Conditions in the US Versus Canada: Rationale for Use and Patient-Health Care Provider Interactions.ACR open rheumatology · 2023Article
- Medical Cannabis Use Among Canadian Veterans and Non-Veterans: A National Survey.Integrative medicine reports · 2023Article
- The role of personality traits on self-medicated cannabis in rheumatoid arthritis patients: A multivariable analysis.PloS one · 2023Article
- The evolving culture of medical cannabis in Canada for the management of chronic pain.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Review
- Healthcare provider and medical cannabis patient communication regarding referral and medication substitution: the Canadian context.Journal of cannabis research · 2022Article
- Exploring cannabis use and perspectives among psoriatic disease patients.Clinical rheumatology · 2022Article
- Cannabis for Rheumatic Disease Pain: a Review of Current Literature.Current rheumatology reports · 2022Review
- Prevalence of cannabis use for pain management in Quebec: A post-legalization estimate among generations living with chronic pain.Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur · 2022Article
- Cannabidiol Product Dosing and Decision-Making in a National Survey of Individuals with Fibromyalgia.The journal of pain · 2022Article
- Review
- [Medications when travelling with underlying inflammatory rheumatic disease].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2021Review
- Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use in Psoriatic Arthritis Patients: a Review.Current rheumatology reports · 2020Review
- Exploring Clinicians' Determinants of Participation in Medical Cannabis Decision Making with Older Adults Experiencing Arthritis: A Qualitative Descriptive Study.MDM policy & practiceArticle
- Cannabis Use in Arthritis: Impact on Health-Related Quality of Life.Medical cannabis and cannabinoidsArticle
- Perceptions of Cannabis Use: A Qualitative Descriptive Study of Rheumatology Patients.Journal of primary care & community healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveRecreational legalization of cannabis may influence the medical use by patients. When only medical access was legally available in Canada, 4.3% of rheumatology patients reported use. With the current recreational legalization, we have reexamined the prevalence and characteristics of medical cannabis use in this same rheumatology setting.
methodsConsecutively attending rheumatology patients participated in an onsite survey comprising the following two questionnaires: 1) demographic and disease information completed by the rheumatologist and 2) patient anonymous questionnaire of health status, cannabis use (recreational and/or medicinal), and characteristics of cannabis use.
resultsOf 1047 attendees from June to August 2019, with 1000 participating, medical cannabis had been used by 12.6% of patients (95% confidence interval 10.7%-14.8%), with half continuing use for mostly pain relief. Discontinuation was due to lack of effect in 57% of patients and side effects in 28% of patients. Ever medical users were younger (61.2 vs. 64.9 years; P = 0.006), more likely unemployed/disabled (16.7% vs. 5.9%; P < 0.001), and had more previous (47.6% vs. 25.5%; P < 0.001) and current recreational cannabis use (17.5% vs. 3.1%; P < 0.001) than nonusers. Most patients used multiple methods of administration, including smoking, vaporizing, and using oral oil preparations, but were poorly knowledgeable of product content, which was bought solely via the legal medical route by only 20%, and only one-third disclosed their use to the rheumatologist.
conclusionMedical cannabis use has tripled for rheumatology patients since recreational legalization, with users being younger, not working, and having recreational cannabis experience. Concerning issues are the poor knowledge of the product being used, access via the nonmedical route, and nondisclosure to the physician.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.