Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32353072›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Understanding biochemical design principles with ensembles of canonical non-linear models.

Lukas Bromig, Andreas Kremling, Alberto Marin-Sanguino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Format-Preserving Reduction of Canonical Nonlinear Models.Bulletin of mathematical biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Usage of Digital Twins Along a Typical Process Development Cycle.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lukas BromigSpecialty Division for Systems Biotechnology, Technische Universität München, Garching, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3911-4622
Andreas KremlingSpecialty Division for Systems Biotechnology, Technische Universität München, Garching, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9533-6786
Alberto Marin-SanguinoSpecialty Division for Systems Biotechnology, Technische Universität München, Garching, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8728-7689

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systems biology applies concepts from engineering in order to understand biological networks. If such an understanding was complete, biologists would be able to design ad hoc biochemical components tailored for different purposes, which is the goal of synthetic biology. Needless to say that we are far away from creating biological subsystems as intricate and precise as those found in nature, but mathematical models and high throughput techniques have brought us a long way in this direction. One of the difficulties that still needs to be overcome is finding the right values for model parameters and dealing with uncertainty, which is proving to be an extremely difficult task. In this work, we take advantage of ensemble modeling techniques, where a large number of models with different parameter values are formulated and then tested according to some performance criteria. By finding features shared by successful models, the role of different components and the synergies between them can be better understood. We will address some of the difficulties often faced by ensemble modeling approaches, such as the need to sample a space whose size grows exponentially with the number of parameters, and establishing useful selection criteria. Some methods will be shown to reduce the predictions from many models into a set of understandable "design principles" that can guide us to improve or manufacture a biochemical network. Our proposed framework formulates models within standard formalisms in order to integrate information from different sources and minimize the dimension of the parameter space. Additionally, the mathematical properties of the formalism enable a partition of the parameter space into independent subspaces. Each of these subspaces can be paired with a set of criteria that depend exclusively on it, thus allowing a separate sampling/screening in spaces of lower dimension. By applying tests in a strict order where computationally cheaper tests are applied first to each subspace and applying computationally expensive tests to the remaining subset thereafter, the use of resources is optimized and a larger number of models can be examined. This can be compared to a complex database query where the order of the requests can make a huge difference in the processing time. The method will be illustrated by analyzing a classical model of a metabolic pathway with end-product inhibition. Even for such a simple model, the method provides novel insight.

Indexed as

Nonlinear DynamicsPhenotypeSystems Biology

Identifiers

PMID32353072
PMCPMC7192416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.