Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32353023›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Chloroplast genomes of Rubiaceae: Comparative genomics and molecular phylogeny in subfamily Ixoroideae.

Serigne Ndiawar Ly, Andrea Garavito, Petra De Block, Pieter Asselman, Christophe Guyeux, Jean-Claude Charr, Steven Janssens, Arnaud Mouly, Perla Hamon, Romain Guyot

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. TheFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. The complete chloroplast genome sequence ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The complete chloroplast genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Serigne Ndiawar LyInstitut de Recherche pour le Développement, UMR DIADE, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Andrea GaravitoDepartamento Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad de Caldas, Manizales, Colombia.
Petra De BlockMeise Botanic Garden, Meise, Belgium.
Pieter AsselmanMeise Botanic Garden, Meise, Belgium.
Christophe GuyeuxFemto-ST Institute, UMR 6174 CNRS, Université de Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Besançon, France.
Jean-Claude CharrFemto-ST Institute, UMR 6174 CNRS, Université de Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Besançon, France.
Steven JanssensMeise Botanic Garden, Meise, Belgium.
Arnaud MoulyLaboratory Chrono-Environment, UMR CNRS 6249, Université de Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Besançon, France.
Perla HamonInstitut de Recherche pour le Développement, UMR DIADE, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Romain GuyotInstitut de Recherche pour le Développement, UMR DIADE, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7016-7485
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRMeise Botanic Garden · BEUniversité de Montpellier · FRUniversity of Caldas · CO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Rubiaceae phylogenetics, the number of markers often proved a limitation with authors failing to provide well-supported trees at tribal and generic levels. A robust phylogeny is a prerequisite to study the evolutionary patterns of traits at different taxonomic levels. Advances in next-generation sequencing technologies have revolutionized biology by providing, at reduced cost, huge amounts of data for an increased number of species. Due to their highly conserved structure, generally recombination-free, and mostly uniparental inheritance, chloroplast DNA sequences have long been used as choice markers for plant phylogeny reconstruction. The main objectives of this study are: 1) to gain insight in chloroplast genome evolution in the Rubiaceae (Ixoroideae) through efficient methodology for de novo assembly of plastid genomes; and, 2) to test the efficiency of mining SNPs in the nuclear genome of Ixoroideae based on the use of a coffee reference genome to produce well-supported nuclear trees. We assembled whole chloroplast genome sequences for 27 species of the Rubiaceae subfamily Ixoroideae using next-generation sequences. Analysis of the plastid genome structure reveals a relatively good conservation of gene content and order. Generally, low variation was observed between taxa in the boundary regions with the exception of the inverted repeat at both the large and short single copy junctions for some taxa. An average of 79% of the SNP determined in the Coffea genus are transferable to Ixoroideae, with variation ranging from 35% to 96%. In general, the plastid and the nuclear genome phylogenies are congruent with each other. They are well-resolved with well-supported branches. Generally, the tribes form well-identified clades but the tribe Sherbournieae is shown to be polyphyletic. The results are discussed relative to the methodology used and the chloroplast genome features in Rubiaceae and compared to previous Rubiaceae phylogenies.

Indexed as

ChloroplastsCoffeaDNA, ChloroplastEvolution, MolecularGenome, ChloroplastGenome, PlantGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingPhylogenyPolymorphism, Single NucleotideRubiaceaeSequence Analysis, DNADNA, Chloroplast

Identifiers

PMID32353023
PMCPMC7192488
OpenAlexW3020987458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.