ArticlePloS one2020
Reliability and construct validity of a composite pain scale for rabbit (CANCRS) in a clinical environment.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.
- When touch is stressful: acute endocrine and behavioral responses of domestic rabbits to unfamiliar human handling.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Agreement of Feline Grimace Scale scores between chatbots and an expert rater.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Survey of German veterinarians' approaches to pain assessment and management of perioperative pain in pet rabbits.The Veterinary record · 2025Article
- Gastric dilatation and volvulus in a 5-year-old intact female Holland lop rabbit.The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2025Article
- Research Methods for the Analysis of Visual Emotion Cues in Animals: A Workshop Report.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Dental disease in rabbits under UK primary veterinary care: Clinical management and associated welfare impacts.The Veterinary record · 2025Article
- Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Topical Long-Acting Buprenorphine in New Zealand White Rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus).Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2025Article
- How facial expressions reveal acute pain in domestic animals with facial pain scales as a diagnostic tool.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Review
- Comparison between Carprofen and Meloxicam for Post-Neutering Pain Management in Pet Rabbits.Veterinary sciences · 2024Article
- An investigation into how accurately UK rabbit owners identify pain in their pet rabbits.BMC veterinary research · 2024Article
- Effects of Intratesticular Lidocaine in Pet Rabbits Undergoing Orchiectomy.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Deep learning for video-based automated pain recognition in rabbits.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Intranasal Atomization of Ketamine, Medetomidine and Butorphanol in Pet Rabbits Using a Mucosal Atomization Device.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Establishment of a rabbit liver metastasis model by percutaneous puncture of the spleen and implantation of the VX2 tumor strain under CT guidance.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Effects of Human Observer Presence on Pain Assessment Using Facial Expressions in Rabbits.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2023Article
- Pain Management and Analgesics Used in Small Mammals during Post-Operative Period with an Emphasis on Metamizole (Dipyrone) as an Alternative Medication.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Enhanced nociceptive behavior and expansion of associated primary afferents in a rabbit model of cerebral palsy.Journal of neuroscience research · 2022Article
- Bristol Rabbit Pain Scale (BRPS): clinical utility, validity and reliability.BMC veterinary research · 2022Article
- Ultrasound-Guided Saphenous Nerve Block in Rabbits (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Validation of the rabbit pain behaviour scale (RPBS) to assess acute postoperative pain in rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus).PloS one · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A composite pain scale for assessing and quantifying pain in rabbits (CANCRS) has been designed merging the Rabbit Grimace Scale (RbtGS) and a scale including clinical parameters (CPS). Construct validity and inter-rater reliability were assessed for CANCRS, for RbtGS and for CPS, in order to test their potential to detect pain in a clinical setting. Rabbits (n = 116) were either hybrids or purebreds and they were independently evaluated by two raters, who could be veterinarians (V) or veterinary medicine students (S). Score intervals determined four pain classes (No pain, Discomfort, Moderate pain and Severe pain) that matched presumptive pain classes associated with some pathological conditions. A chi-square test was used to assess the construct validity of the scales by checking how frequently scale results and presumptive pain classes matched. Sixty-nine patients were evaluated by one V and one S, whereas forty-seven rabbits were assessed by two V, in order to test inter-rater reliability. An intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to test reliability of the scales, whereas Cohen's kappa tested inter-rater agreement for each parameter of the CANCRS. Construct validity results show that CANCRS and RbtGS efficiently reveal pain (P ≤ 0.05), while CPS does not (p > 0.05). Inter-rater reliability was very good for both CANCRS and CPS (ICC 0.88 V-V, 0.94 between V-S; ICC 0.97 V-V, 0.91 V-S) and good for RbtGS (ICC 0.77 V-V, 0.88 V-S); therefore, CPS reproducibility was better between veterinarians and students than between veterinarians. Inter-rater agreement between veterinarians and veterinary medicine students was moderate to very good for all the parameters included in the CANCRS (Cohen's kappa >0,60). In conclusion, it is possible to state that the CANCRS has construct validity and it is a reliable tool for use in clinical practice, when coping with many rabbits with morphological differences. It is easy and fast to use and enriches the RbtGS with some clinical parameters that should be monitored during any clinical examination, allowing for capture of the multidimensional aspect of pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.