Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32352950›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2020

Comparison of Efficacies of Commonly Used Hypertension Treatment Modalities: A Retrospective Study of 1900 Participants in a Hypertension Clinic.

Xiexiong Zhao, Anu Dahal, Qiong Yang, Yan Yang, Zewen Ding, Junwen Wang, Joel Dominic Swai, Weihong Jiang, Xiaogang Li

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiexiong ZhaoDepartment of Cardiology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China (mainland).
Anu DahalDepartment of Cardiology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China (mainland).
Qiong YangDepartment of Cardiology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China (mainland).
Yan YangDepartment of Cardiology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China (mainland).
Zewen DingDepartment of Cardiology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China (mainland).
Junwen WangDepartment of Cardiology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China (mainland).
Joel Dominic SwaiDepartment of Nephrology and Rheumatology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China (mainland).
Weihong JiangDepartment of Cardiology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China (mainland).
Xiaogang LiDepartment of Cardiology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China (mainland).
Central South University · CNThird Xiangya Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Although various antihypertensive medications are available, some hypertensive patients have uncontrolled blood pressures, especially in the clinic. The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacies of various antihypertensive therapies in our hypertension (HTN) clinic (monotherapy vs. combination therapy, fixed-dose combination (FDC) versus free equivalent combination (FEC), and diuretics versus non-diuretics. MATERIAL AND METHODS In this retrospective study, patients at the HTN clinic of the Third Xiangya Hospital with primary hypertension were enrolled from June 2016 to February 2017. Data on participants' basic characteristics, blood pressure data, and treatment modalities were collected. The proportions of participants attaining target blood pressure after treatment with antihypertensive modalities were calculated and compared. RESULTS Among 1900 participants, combination therapy had a better control efficacy than monotherapy (P<0.0005). When HTN was treated by 2 kinds of drugs, FEC was used much more frequently than FDC (P<0.0005). In grade 3 HTN, FDC had a higher control rate (P=0.002). If more than 2 kinds of drugs were used, FDC+OTHER had a slightly higher control rate in grade 2 and 3 (42.1% vs. 38.5%, P=0.724; 36.2% vs. 31.0%, P=0.526, respectively). Therapies with diuretics had better control rates than those without diuretics (43.1% vs. 36.9%, P=0.025). CONCLUSIONS In our clinic, FEC was prescribed more often than FDC. When blood pressure is significantly elevated, especially at levels 2 or 3, FDC seems to have a better control rate than FEC. Therapies with diuretics controlled HTN more efficiently.

Indexed as

AgedAntihypertensive AgentsAsian PeopleBlood PressureChinaDiureticsDrug Therapy, CombinationEssential HypertensionFemaleHumansHypertensionMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAntihypertensive AgentsDiuretics

Identifiers

PMID32352950
PMCPMC7207006
OpenAlexW3010956170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.