Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32352721›Full record

SynthesisClinical and translational gastroenterology2020

Timing of Performing Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography and Inpatient Mortality in Acute Cholangitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Lijun Du, Mengsha Cen, Xia Zheng, Liang Luo, Ali Siddiqui, John J Kim

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical and translational gastroenterology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Acute cholangitis: Does malignant biliary obstructionWorld journal of clinical cases · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Timing of biliary decompression for acute cholangitis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Lijun DuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Mengsha CenDepartment of Gastroenterology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Xia ZhengDepartment of Gastroenterology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Liang LuoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Ali SiddiquiDivision of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, California, USA.
John J KimDepartment of Gastroenterology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital · CNLoma Linda University · USZhejiang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAlthough early biliary drainage improves outcomes in patients with acute cholangitis, the optimal time to perform endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is controversial. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of timing of ERCP on mortality in hospitalized patients with acute cholangitis.

methodsWe searched PubMed, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library (until February 2019) for studies evaluating the impact of timing of ERCP (<24, <48, and <72 hours from hospitalization) on outcomes in patients with acute cholangitis. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality.

resultsFourteen observational studies, including 84,063 patients (mean age = 66 ± 18), met the study criteria. The overall pooled in-hospital mortality with acute cholangitis was 1.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8%-7.6%), which increased to 4.3% (95% CI 1.8%-8.7%) when administrative database studies were excluded. In 9 studies, ERCP performed <24 compared with ≥24 hours decreased in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR] = 0.81, 95% CI 0.73-0.90; I = 0%). In 8 studies, ERCP performed <48 compared with ≥48 hours decreased in-hospital mortality (OR = 0.57, 95% CI 0.51-0.63; I = 0%). In 4 studies, ERCP performed <72 compared with ≥72 hours decreased in-hospital mortality (OR = 0.32, 95% CI 0.15-0.68; I = 0%). Furthermore, hospital stay was reduced in patients receiving ERCP <24 compared with ≥24 hours (mean difference [MD] = 3.2 days, 95% CI 2.3-4.1; I = 78%), <48 compared with ≥48 hours (MD = 3.6 days, 95% CI 2.1-5.1; I = 98%), and <72 compared with ≥72 hours (MD = 4.1 days, 95% CI 0.9-7.3; I = 63%). DISCUSSION: In observational studies, earlier ERCP performed in patients with acute cholangitis, even urgently performed <24 hours from presentation, was associated with reduced mortality. A randomized trial evaluating the impact of urgent ERCP on outcomes is needed.

Indexed as

Hospital MortalityAcute DiseaseCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeCholangitisEmergency TreatmentGastroenterologyHumansObservational Studies as TopicPractice Guidelines as TopicSocieties, MedicalTime FactorsTime-to-TreatmentTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID32352721
PMCPMC7145040
OpenAlexW3013926168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.