ArticleClinical and translational gastroenterology2020
Accuracy of Noninvasive Fibrosis Scoring Systems in African American and White Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.
Article in Clinical and translational gastroenterology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Accuracy of prognostic serological biomarkers in predicting liver fibrosis severity in people with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: a meta-analysis of over 40,000 participants.Frontiers in nutrition · 2024Pooled it
- Nonlinear Association Between Metabolic Syndrome Severity and Advanced Fibrosis in Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease.Gastro hep advances · 2026Article
- Comparing FIB-4, VCTE, pSWE, 2D-SWE, and MRE Thresholds and Diagnostic Accuracies for Detecting Hepatic Fibrosis in Patients with MASLD: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Development and validation of a scoring system to predict MASLD patients with significant hepatic fibrosis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Accuracy of Noninvasive Diagnostic Tests for the Detection of Significant and Advanced Fibrosis Stages in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Systematic Literature Review of the US Studies.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- MAFLD/NAFLD Biopsy-Free Scoring Systems for Hepatic Steatosis, NASH, and Fibrosis Diagnosis.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesNonalcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score (NFS), fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) score, aspartate aminotransferase (AST)-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) score, and AST-alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ratio are noninvasive fibrosis scoring systems for the staging of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic liver disease.
methodsIn a large cohort of patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, we compared AST-ALT ratio, NFS, FIB-4 score, and APRI score in predicting advanced fibrosis (defined as fibrosis stage ≥ 3) in histologically confirmed African American (AA) and white patients. We identified 907 patients: 677 (74.6%) white and 230 (25.3%) AA patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.
resultsOf the 907 patients, 115 (12.8%) patients had advanced fibrosis (stages 3 and 4) in the total cohort: 6 (2.6%) AAs, and 109 (16.2%) whites. In AAs, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (area under the curve) for predicting advanced fibrosis was 0.58 by NFS, 0.86 by APRI score, 0.77 by FIB-4 score, and 0.65 by AST-ALT ratio. In whites, the area under the receiver operating characteristic for predicting advanced fibrosis was 0.82 by NFS, 0.82 by APRI score, 0.88 by FIB-4 score, and 0.76 by AST-ALT ratio. In the AA population, NFS > 0.675, FIB-4 score > 2.67, and APRI score > 1.5 each has a negative predictive value of 98%, whereas the negative predictive values in whites are 91%, 88%, and 85%, respectively. DISCUSSION: Noninvasive fibrosis scoring systems can reliably exclude advanced fibrosis in both AAs and whites and have acceptable discriminatory ability to predict advanced fibrosis in whites. The utility of noninvasive fibrosis scoring systems in predicting advanced fibrosis in AAs needs further validation in a larger multicenter cohort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.