Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32352532›Full record

ArticleGigaScience2020

The gene-rich genome of the scallop Pecten maximus.

Nathan J Kenny, Shane A McCarthy, Olga Dudchenko, Katherine James, Emma Betteridge, Craig Corton, Jale Dolucan, Dan Mead, Karen Oliver, Arina D Omer and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GigaScience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
12.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Genome of Kumamoto OysterEvolutionary applications · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Acceleration of genome rearrangement in clitellate annelids.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  13. The First High-Quality Genome Assembly of Freshwater Pearl MusselInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Nathan J KennyNatural History Museum, Department of Life Sciences,Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK.
Shane A McCarthyUniversity of Cambridge, Department of Genetics,Cambridge CB2 3EH, UK.
Olga DudchenkoThe Center for Genome Architecture, Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Katherine JamesNatural History Museum, Department of Life Sciences,Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK.
Emma BetteridgeWellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK.
Craig CortonWellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK.
Jale DolucanWellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK.
Dan MeadWellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK.
Karen OliverWellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK.
Arina D OmerThe Center for Genome Architecture, Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Sarah PelanWellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK.
Yan RyanSchool of Computing, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK.
Ying SimsWellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK.
Jason SkeltonWellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK.
Michelle SmithWellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK.
James TorranceWellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK.
David WeiszThe Center for Genome Architecture, Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Anil WipatSchool of Computing, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK.
Erez L AidenThe Center for Genome Architecture, Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Kerstin HoweWellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK.
Suzanne T WilliamsNatural History Museum, Department of Life Sciences,Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK.
Wellcome Sanger Institute · GBBaylor College of Medicine · USNatural History Museum · GBNewcastle University · GBThe University of Western Australia · AUUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

GENOME WIDE MAPPING OF LOOPS USING IN SITU HI-CUM1HG009375 · NHGRI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI LIEBERMAN-AIDEN, EREZ · 2017 to 2021
$4.7M
Supplement - Beyond pairwise DNA contacts: exploring higher-order genome structure using proximity ligationU01HL130010 · NHLBI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI LIEBERMAN-AIDEN, EREZ · 2015 to 2019
$2.3M
NHGRI NIH HHS UM1 HG009375NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL130010Wellcome Trust WT207492
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe king scallop, Pecten maximus, is distributed in shallow waters along the Atlantic coast of Europe. It forms the basis of a valuable commercial fishery and plays a key role in coastal ecosystems and food webs. Like other filter feeding bivalves it can accumulate potent phytotoxins, to which it has evolved some immunity. The molecular origins of this immunity are of interest to evolutionary biologists, pharmaceutical companies, and fisheries management.

findingsHere we report the genome assembly of this species, conducted as part of the Wellcome Sanger 25 Genomes Project. This genome was assembled from PacBio reads and scaffolded with 10X Chromium and Hi-C data. Its 3,983 scaffolds have an N50 of 44.8 Mb (longest scaffold 60.1 Mb), with 92% of the assembly sequence contained in 19 scaffolds, corresponding to the 19 chromosomes found in this species. The total assembly spans 918.3 Mb and is the best-scaffolded marine bivalve genome published to date, exhibiting 95.5% recovery of the metazoan BUSCO set. Gene annotation resulted in 67,741 gene models. Analysis of gene content revealed large numbers of gene duplicates, as previously seen in bivalves, with little gene loss, in comparison with the sequenced genomes of other marine bivalve species.

conclusionsThe genome assembly of P. maximus and its annotated gene set provide a high-quality platform for studies on such disparate topics as shell biomineralization, pigmentation, vision, and resistance to algal toxins. As a result of our findings we highlight the sodium channel gene Nav1, known to confer resistance to saxitoxin and tetrodotoxin, as a candidate for further studies investigating immunity to domoic acid.

Indexed as

GenomeGenomicsAnimalsComputational BiologyGenetic Association StudiesPectenPhenotypePhylogenybivalvedomoicgenomemolluscneurotoxinscallop

Identifiers

PMID32352532
PMCPMC7191990
OpenAlexW3023915642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.