Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32352355›Full record

ArticleMedical education online2020

Evaluating the effectiveness of undergraduate clinical education programs.

John W Ragsdale, Andrea Berry, Jennifer W Gibson, Christiane R Herber-Valdez, Lauren J Germain, Deborah L Engle, representing the Program Evaluation Special Interest Group of the Southern Group on Educational Affairs (SGEA) within the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC)

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical education online, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

John W RagsdaleAssistant Dean for Clinical Education, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9942-1192
Andrea BerryExecutive Director of Faculty Life, University of Central Florida College of Medicine, Orlando, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3884-4108
Jennifer W GibsonDirector, Office of Medical Education, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5864-0903
Christiane R Herber-ValdezAssistant Professor, Department of Medical Education, Paul L. Foster School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center at El Paso, El Paso, TX, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7170-9605
Lauren J GermainDirector of Evaluation, Assessment and Research; Assistant Professor, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4357-4314
Deborah L EngleAssistant Dean, Assessment and Evaluation, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1849-6828
representing the Program Evaluation Special Interest Group of the Southern Group on Educational Affairs (SGEA) within the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical schools should use a variety of measures to evaluate the effectiveness of their clinical curricula. Both outcome measures and process measures should be included, and these can be organized according to the four-level training evaluation model developed by Donald Kirkpatrick. Managing evaluation data requires the institution to employ deliberate strategies to monitor signals in real-time and aggregate data so that informed decisions can be made. Future steps in program evaluation includes increased emphasis on patient outcomes and multi-source feedback, as well as better integration of existing data sources.

Indexed as

Clinical ClerkshipCurriculumEducation, Medical, UndergraduateHumansProgram EvaluationSchools, Medicalaccreditationclinical educationcurriculumprogram evaluationUndergraduate medical education

Identifiers

PMID32352355
PMCPMC7241512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.