Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32352347›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition2021

When and how did you go wrong? Characterizing mild functional difficulties in older adults during an everyday task.

Ross Divers, Lillian Ham, Anastasia Matchanova, Katherine Hackett, Rachel Mis, Kia Howard, Sarah Seligman Rycroft, Emily Roll, Tania Giovannetti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A Pilot Study of the Effect of Repeated Practice in Virtual Reality on Everyday Action Performance in Real Life.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ross DiversDepartment of Psychology, Temple University , Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Lillian HamDepartment of Psychology, Temple University , Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Anastasia MatchanovaDepartment of Psychology, University of Houston , Houston, TX, USA.
Katherine HackettDepartment of Psychology, Temple University , Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Rachel MisDepartment of Psychology, Temple University , Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Kia HowardDepartment of Psychology, Temple University , Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Sarah Seligman RycroftDepartment of Psychology, Temple University , Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Emily RollDepartment of Psychology, Temple University , Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Tania GiovannettiDepartment of Psychology, Temple University , Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5661-152X

Funding

Assessing Everyday Function in Older Adults with the Virtual KitchenR01AG062503 · NIA · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI GIOVANNETTI, TANIA · 2020 to 2024
$1.8M
Improving Everyday Task Performance through Repeated Practice in Virtual RealityR21AG066771 · NIA · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI GIOVANNETTI, TANIA · 2020 to 2021
$438k
Feasibility of the SmartPrompt for Improving Everyday Function in DementiaR21AG060422 · NIA · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI GIOVANNETTI, TANIA · 2019 to 2020
$426k
Validation of Smartphone-Derived Digital Phenotypes for Cognitive Assessment in Older AdultsF31AG069444 · NIA · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI HACKETT, KATHERINE · 2020 to 2022
$66k
NIA NIH HHS F31 AG069444NIA NIH HHS R01 AG062503NIA NIH HHS R21 AG060422NIA NIH HHS R21 AG066771
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mild functional difficulties associated with cognitive aging may be reliably measured by coding "micro-errors" during everyday tasks, like meal preparation. Micro-errors made by 25 older adult and 48 younger adults were coded on four dimensions to evaluate the influence of: 1) poor error monitoring; 2) goal decay; 3) competition for response selection when switching to a new subtask; and 4) interference from distractor objects. Micro-errors made by young adults under a dual task load also were analyzed to determine the influence of overall performance level. Older adults' micro-errors were observed when switching to a new subtask and to unrelated distractors. Slowed error monitoring and goal decay also influenced micro-errors in older adults, but not significantly more so than younger adults under the dual task. Interventions to reduce interference from distractors and to increase attention at critical choice points during tasks may optimize everyday functioning and preclude decline in older adults.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAttentionCognitive AgingExecutive FunctionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychomotor PerformanceYoung Adultactivities of daily livingAgingcognitive interferenceerror monitoringeveryday functionobject use

Identifiers

PMID32352347
PMCPMC7606330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.