Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32351948›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2020

Predicting Concussion Outcome by Integrating Finite Element Modeling and Network Analysis.

Erin D Anderson, J Sebastian Giudice, Taotao Wu, Matthew B Panzer, David F Meaney

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Brain architecture-based vulnerability to traumatic injury.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Erin D AndersonDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
J Sebastian GiudiceDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.
Taotao WuDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.
Matthew B PanzerDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.
David F MeaneyDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
University of Virginia · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Mechanisms of remodeling circuit connectivity after traumatic brain injuryR01NS088176 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MEANEY, DAVID F · 2015 to 2018
$1.4M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS088176
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Concussion is a significant public health problem affecting 1.6-2.4 million Americans annually. An alternative to reducing the burden of concussion is to reduce its incidence with improved protective equipment and injury mitigation systems. Finite element (FE) models of the brain response to blunt trauma are often used to estimate injury potential and can lead to improved helmet designs. However, these models have yet to incorporate how the patterns of brain connectivity disruption after impact affects the relay of information in the injured brain. Furthermore, FE brain models typically do not consider the differences in individual brain structural connectivities and their purported role in concussion risk. Here, we use graph theory techniques to integrate brain deformations predicted from FE modeling with measurements of network efficiency to identify brain regions whose connectivity characteristics may influence concussion risk. We computed maximum principal strain in 129 brain regions using head kinematics measured from 53 professional football impact reconstructions that included concussive and non-concussive cases. In parallel, using diffusion spectrum imaging data from 30 healthy subjects, we simulated structural lesioning of each of the same 129 brain regions. We simulated lesioning by removing each region one at a time along with all its connections. In turn, we computed the resultant change in global efficiency to identify regions important for network communication. We found that brain regions that deformed the most during an impact did not overlap with regions most important for network communication (Pearson's correlation, ρ = 0.07;

Indexed as

biomechanicsconcussiongraph theorynetworksstructural connectivity

Identifiers

PMID32351948
PMCPMC7174699
OpenAlexW3017168997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.