Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32351798›Full record

ReviewApplications in plant sciences2020

Strategies for reducing per-sample costs in target capture sequencing for phylogenomics and population genomics in plants.

Haley Hale, Elliot M Gardner, Juan Viruel, Lisa Pokorny, Matthew G Johnson

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Applications in plant sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 119 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Applying Target Capture Sequencing to Unravel thePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Insect Phylogenomics: From Experiment Planning to Post-phylogenetic Analyses.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Haley HaleDepartment of Biological Sciences Texas Tech University Lubbock Texas 79409 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3318-8383
Elliot M GardnerThe Morton Arboretum Lisle Illinois 60532 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1133-5167
Juan ViruelRoyal Botanic Gardens Kew, Richmond Surrey TW9 3DS United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5658-8411
Lisa PokornyRoyal Botanic Gardens Kew, Richmond Surrey TW9 3DS United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2478-8555
Matthew G JohnsonDepartment of Biological Sciences Texas Tech University Lubbock Texas 79409 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1958-6334
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew · GBTexas Tech University · USNational Parks Board · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The reduced cost of high-throughput sequencing and the development of gene sets with wide phylogenetic applicability has led to the rise of sequence capture methods as a plausible platform for both phylogenomics and population genomics in plants. An important consideration in large targeted sequencing projects is the per-sample cost, which can be inflated when using off-the-shelf kits or reagents not purchased in bulk. Here, we discuss methods to reduce per-sample costs in high-throughput targeted sequencing projects. We review the minimal equipment and consumable requirements for targeted sequencing while comparing several alternatives to reduce bulk costs in DNA extraction, library preparation, target enrichment, and sequencing. We consider how each of the workflow alterations may be affected by DNA quality (e.g., fresh vs. herbarium tissue), genome size, and the phylogenetic scale of the project. We provide a cost calculator for researchers considering targeted sequencing to use when designing projects, and identify challenges for future development of low-cost sequencing in non-model plant systems.

Indexed as

enzymatic fragmentationherbariomicshigh‐throughput workflow implementationHyb‐Seqlow‐cost sequence capturepooling and multiplexing strategies

Identifiers

PMID32351798
PMCPMC7186906
OpenAlexW3017277773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.