Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32351525›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2020

Functional Imaging of Microbial Interactions With Tree Roots Using a Microfluidics Setup.

Marie-Francoise Noirot-Gros, Shalaka V Shinde, Chase Akins, Jessica L Johnson, Sarah Zerbs, Rosemarie Wilton, Kenneth M Kemner, Philippe Noirot, Gyorgy Babnigg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Plant-environment microscopy tracks interactions ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Deciphering bacterial mechanisms of root colonization.Environmental microbiology reports · 2021
    Review
  17. Microfluidic Devices for Monitoring the Root Morphology of Arabidopsis Thaliana in situ.Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Marie-Francoise Noirot-GrosBiosciences Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL, United States.
Shalaka V ShindeBiosciences Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL, United States.
Chase AkinsBiosciences Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL, United States.
Jessica L JohnsonBiosciences Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL, United States.
Sarah ZerbsBiosciences Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL, United States.
Rosemarie WiltonBiosciences Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL, United States.
Kenneth M KemnerBiosciences Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL, United States.
Philippe NoirotBiosciences Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL, United States.
Gyorgy BabniggBiosciences Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coupling microfluidics with microscopy has emerged as a powerful approach to study at cellular resolution the dynamics in plant physiology and root-microbe interactions (RMIs). Most devices have been designed to study the model plant

Indexed as

Bacillus subtilisbiosensormicrofluidicsPopulus tremuloidesPseudomonas fluorescensroot-microbe interaction

Identifiers

PMID32351525
PMCPMC7174594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.