Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32351450›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in endocrinology2020

Spinal Cord Injury as a Model of Bone-Muscle Interactions: Therapeutic Implications From

Marco Invernizzi, Alessandro de Sire, Filippo Renò, Carlo Cisari, Letterio Runza, Alessio Baricich, Stefano Carda, Nicola Fusco

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Efficacy of neuromodulation and rehabilitation approaches on pain relief in patients with spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Implications of enolase in the RANKL-mediated osteoclast activity following spinal cord injury.Biocell : official journal of the Sociedades Latinoamericanas de Microscopia Electronica ... et. al · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Marco InvernizziPhysical and Rehabilitative Medicine, Department of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy.
Alessandro de SirePhysical and Rehabilitative Medicine, Department of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy.
Filippo RenòInnovative Research Laboratory for Wound Healing, Department of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy.
Carlo CisariPhysical and Rehabilitative Medicine, Department of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy.
Letterio RunzaDivision of Pathology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Alessio BaricichPhysical and Rehabilitative Medicine, Department of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy.
Stefano CardaNeuropsychology and Neurorehabilitation Service, Department of Clinical Neuroscience. Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Nicola FuscoDivision of Pathology, IEO - European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” · ITAzienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Maggiore della Carita · ITFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · ITUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal cord injuries (SCIs) represent a variety of conditions related to the damage of the spinal cord with consequent musculoskeletal repercussions. The bone and muscle tissues share several catabolic pathways that lead to variable degrees of disability in SCI patients. In this review article, we provide a comprehensive characterization of the available treatment options targeting the skeleton and the bone in the setting of SCI. Among the pharmacological intervention, bisphosphonates, anti-sclerostin monoclonal antibodies, hydrogen sulfide, parathyroid hormone, and RANKL pathway inhibitors represent valuable options for treating bone alterations. Loss phenomena at the level of the muscle can be counteracted with testosterone, anabolic-androgenic steroids, and selective androgen receptor modulators. Exercise and physical therapy are valuable strategies to increase bone and muscle mass. Nutritional interventions could enhance SCI treatment, particularly in the setting of synergistic and multidisciplinary interventions, but there are no specific guidelines available to date. The development of multidisciplinary recommendations is required for a proper clinical management of SCI patients.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsHumansIn Vitro TechniquesMuscle, SkeletalMusculoskeletal DiseasesOsteoporosisSpinal Cord Injuriesbonebone lossmuscleosteoporosisrehabilitationsarcopeniaspinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID32351450
PMCPMC7174687
OpenAlexW3016605673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.