Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32351413›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2020

Identifying Predictors of Suicide in Severe Mental Illness: A Feasibility Study of a Clinical Prediction Rule (Oxford Mental Illness and Suicide Tool or OxMIS).

Morwenna Senior, Matthias Burghart, Rongqin Yu, Andrey Kormilitzin, Qiang Liu, Nemanja Vaci, Alejo Nevado-Holgado, Smita Pandit, Jakov Zlodre, Seena Fazel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A scoping review of strangulation and hanging: determining suicide from concealed homicide in equivocal death cases.Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Cost-effectiveness of implementing a suicide prediction tool (OxMIS) in severe mental illness: Economic modeling study.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Morwenna SeniorDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Matthias BurghartDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Rongqin YuDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Andrey KormilitzinDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Qiang LiuDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Nemanja VaciDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Alejo Nevado-HolgadoDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Smita PanditOxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Jakov ZlodreOxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Seena FazelDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 202836
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOxford Mental Illness and Suicide tool (OxMIS) is a brief, scalable, freely available, structured risk assessment tool to assess suicide risk in patients with severe mental illness (schizophrenia-spectrum disorders or bipolar disorder). OxMIS requires further external validation, but a lack of large-scale cohorts with relevant variables makes this challenging. Electronic health records provide possible data sources for external validation of risk prediction tools. However, they contain large amounts of information within free-text that is not readily extractable. In this study, we examined the feasibility of identifying suicide predictors needed to validate OxMIS in routinely collected electronic health records.

methodsIn study 1, we manually reviewed electronic health records of 57 patients with severe mental illness to calculate OxMIS risk scores. In study 2, we examined the feasibility of using natural language processing to scale up this process. We used anonymized free-text documents from the Clinical Record Interactive Search database to train a named entity recognition model, a machine learning technique which recognizes concepts in free-text. The model identified eight concepts relevant for suicide risk assessment: medication (antidepressant/antipsychotic treatment), violence, education, self-harm, benefits receipt, drug/alcohol use disorder, suicide, and psychiatric admission. We assessed model performance in terms of precision (similar to positive predictive value), recall (similar to sensitivity) and F1 statistic (an overall performance measure).

resultsIn study 1, we estimated suicide risk for all patients using the OxMIS calculator, giving a range of 12 month risk estimates from 0.1-3.4%. For 13 out of 17 predictors, there was no missing information in electronic health records. For the remaining 4 predictors missingness ranged from 7-26%; to account for these missing variables, it was possible for OxMIS to estimate suicide risk using a range of scores. In study 2, the named entity recognition model had an overall precision of 0.77, recall of 0.90 and F1 score of 0.83. The concept with the best precision and recall was medication (precision 0.84, recall 0.96) and the weakest were suicide (precision 0.37), and drug/alcohol use disorder (recall 0.61).

conclusionsIt is feasible to estimate suicide risk with the OxMIS tool using predictors identified in routine clinical records. Predictors could be extracted using natural language processing. However, electronic health records differ from other data sources, particularly for family history variables, which creates methodological challenges.

Indexed as

bipolar disorderelectronic health recordsfeasibilitynatural language processingOxMISrisk assessmentschizophreniasuicide

Identifiers

PMID32351413
PMCPMC7175991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.