ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2020
Identifying Predictors of Suicide in Severe Mental Illness: A Feasibility Study of a Clinical Prediction Rule (Oxford Mental Illness and Suicide Tool or OxMIS).
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Machine learning and the prediction of suicide in psychiatric populations: a systematic review.Translational psychiatry · 2024Pooled it
- Self-harm in individuals with substance use disorders: Predictive factors and risk model.Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2026Article
- Integration of fairness-awareness into clinical language processing models.Communications medicine · 2026Article
- AI assisted triage of UK patients in mental health care services: a qualitative focus group study of patients' attitudes.BMC psychiatry · 2026Article
- A scoping review of strangulation and hanging: determining suicide from concealed homicide in equivocal death cases.Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law · 2026Article
- Review
- Assessing violence risk in first-episode psychosis: external validation, updating and net benefit of a prediction tool (OxMIV).BMJ mental health · 2023Article
- Predicting suicide risk in 137,112 people with severe mental illness in Finland: external validation of the Oxford Mental Illness and Suicide tool (OxMIS).Translational psychiatry · 2023Article
- Cost-effectiveness of implementing a suicide prediction tool (OxMIS) in severe mental illness: Economic modeling study.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2022Article
- Machine Learning and Non-Affective Psychosis: Identification, Differential Diagnosis, and Treatment.Current psychiatry reports · 2022Review
- Validation of UK Biobank data for mental health outcomes: A pilot study using secondary care electronic health records.International journal of medical informatics · 2022Article
- Looking for low vision: Predicting visual prognosis by fusing structured and free-text data from electronic health records.International journal of medical informatics · 2022Article
- Personalised treatment for cognitive impairment in dementia: development and validation of an artificial intelligence model.BMC medicine · 2022Article
- Evaluating the Risk of Suicide and Violence in Severe Mental Illness: A Feasibility Study of Two Risk Assessment Tools (OxMIS and OxMIV) in General Psychiatric Settings.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
- Year 2020 (with COVID): Observation of Scientific Literature on Clinical Natural Language Processing.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2021Review
- A real-world ten-week follow-up of the COVID outbreak in an outpatient drug clinic in Salamanca (Spain).Journal of substance abuse treatment · 2021Article
- Social and Behavioral Determinants of Health in the Era of Artificial Intelligence with Electronic Health Records: A Scoping Review.Health data science · 2021Article
- Loneliness, social isolation, and effects on cognitive decline in patients with dementia: A retrospective cohort study using natural language processing.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Article
- Balancing Model Complexity and Clinical Deployability in Deep Learning for Sociodemographic Information Extraction.Journal of primary care & community healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOxford Mental Illness and Suicide tool (OxMIS) is a brief, scalable, freely available, structured risk assessment tool to assess suicide risk in patients with severe mental illness (schizophrenia-spectrum disorders or bipolar disorder). OxMIS requires further external validation, but a lack of large-scale cohorts with relevant variables makes this challenging. Electronic health records provide possible data sources for external validation of risk prediction tools. However, they contain large amounts of information within free-text that is not readily extractable. In this study, we examined the feasibility of identifying suicide predictors needed to validate OxMIS in routinely collected electronic health records.
methodsIn study 1, we manually reviewed electronic health records of 57 patients with severe mental illness to calculate OxMIS risk scores. In study 2, we examined the feasibility of using natural language processing to scale up this process. We used anonymized free-text documents from the Clinical Record Interactive Search database to train a named entity recognition model, a machine learning technique which recognizes concepts in free-text. The model identified eight concepts relevant for suicide risk assessment: medication (antidepressant/antipsychotic treatment), violence, education, self-harm, benefits receipt, drug/alcohol use disorder, suicide, and psychiatric admission. We assessed model performance in terms of precision (similar to positive predictive value), recall (similar to sensitivity) and F1 statistic (an overall performance measure).
resultsIn study 1, we estimated suicide risk for all patients using the OxMIS calculator, giving a range of 12 month risk estimates from 0.1-3.4%. For 13 out of 17 predictors, there was no missing information in electronic health records. For the remaining 4 predictors missingness ranged from 7-26%; to account for these missing variables, it was possible for OxMIS to estimate suicide risk using a range of scores. In study 2, the named entity recognition model had an overall precision of 0.77, recall of 0.90 and F1 score of 0.83. The concept with the best precision and recall was medication (precision 0.84, recall 0.96) and the weakest were suicide (precision 0.37), and drug/alcohol use disorder (recall 0.61).
conclusionsIt is feasible to estimate suicide risk with the OxMIS tool using predictors identified in routine clinical records. Predictors could be extracted using natural language processing. However, electronic health records differ from other data sources, particularly for family history variables, which creates methodological challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.