Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32351409›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2020

Cognitive Training for Very High Risk Incarcerated Adolescent Males.

Abby Rowlands, Melissa Fisher, Jyoti Mishra, Mor Nahum, Benjamin Brandrett, Michael Reinke, Michael Caldwell, Kent A Kiehl, Sophia Vinogradov

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Computerized Cognitive Test Batteries for Children and Adolescents-A Scoping Review of Tools For Lab- and Web-Based Settings From 2000 to 2021.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Abby RowlandsSchool of Nursing, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Melissa FisherDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Jyoti MishraDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.
Mor NahumPosit Science Inc., San Francisco, CA, United States.
Benjamin BrandrettDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Michael ReinkeMedical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Michael CaldwellDepartment of Psychology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States.
Kent A KiehlDepartment of Psychology, University of New Mexico and Mind Research Network, Albuquerque, NM, United States.
Sophia VinogradovDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
University of Minnesota · USMind Research Network · USPosit Science (United States) · USUniversity of California, San Diego · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Maryland Medical Center · USUniversity of Minnesota Medical Center · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePersistent violent and antisocial behavior, as manifested in conduct disorder (CD) traits, are associated with a range of cognitive deficits. Individuals with more severe cognitive deficits are more likely to commit violent crimes. Currently, no treatments target improving cognition in high-risk CD youth. This pilot study tests the feasibility and efficacy of delivering intensive tablet-based cognitive training (CT) to adolescent males incarcerated in a youth maximum-security prison.

methodsParticipants were fourteen adolescent males, diagnosed with CD. All participants completed up to 30 h of unsupervised, intensive, adaptive CT exercises that targeted multiple neurocognitive domains, as well as a battery of standardized neurocognitive measures and computerized assessments at baseline and post-training. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: At baseline, participants exhibited significant impairments on neurocognitive measures, relative to age-matched healthy controls. Twelve participants completed training and showed evidence of target engagement, as indexed by improvement in cognitive processing speed. Significant gains were observed in measures of global cognition, with additional gains in cognitive flexibility at trend level significance. Improvements in these measures were positively related to total training time. In summary, both assessments and intervention appear to be feasible, tolerable, and acceptable in incarcerated youth. Intensive CT shows preliminary efficacy in improving neurocognitive performance in key domains, with large effect sizes, and significant performance improvement associations with the time in training.

Indexed as

adolescencecognitioncognitive remediationconduct disorderviolence

Identifiers

PMID32351409
PMCPMC7175987
OpenAlexW3016460468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.