Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32351371›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2020

Brain-Based Binary Communication Using Spatiotemporal Features of fNIRS Responses.

Laurien Nagels-Coune, Amaia Benitez-Andonegui, Niels Reuter, Michael Lührs, Rainer Goebel, Peter De Weerd, Lars Riecke, Bettina Sorger

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06672484 (Gait and Cortical Activity Profile of People With Multiple Sclerosis Presenting With Walking Fatigability), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06672484 active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Gait and Cortical Activity Profile of People With Multiple Sclerosis Presenting With Walking Fatigability

TypeobservationalSponsorHasselt UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled100ConditionsMultiple Sclerosis, Healthy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. From lab to life: challenges and perspectives of fNIRS for haemodynamic-based neurofeedback in real-world environments.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Laurien Nagels-CouneDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Amaia Benitez-AndoneguiDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Niels ReuterInstitute of Systems Neuroscience, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Michael LührsBrain Innovation B.V., Maastricht, Netherlands.
Rainer GoebelDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Peter De WeerdDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Lars RieckeDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Bettina SorgerDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

"Locked-in" patients lose their ability to communicate naturally due to motor system dysfunction. Brain-computer interfacing offers a solution for their inability to communicate by enabling motor-independent communication. Straightforward and convenient in-session communication is essential in clinical environments. The present study introduces a functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS)-based binary communication paradigm that requires limited preparation time and merely nine optodes. Eighteen healthy participants performed two mental imagery tasks, mental drawing and spatial navigation, to answer yes/no questions during one of two auditorily cued time windows. Each of the six questions was answered five times, resulting in five trials per answer. This communication paradigm thus combines both spatial (two different mental imagery tasks, here mental drawing for "yes" and spatial navigation for "no") and temporal (distinct time windows for encoding a "yes" and "no" answer) fNIRS signal features for information encoding. Participants' answers were decoded in simulated real-time using general linear model analysis. Joint analysis of all five encoding trials resulted in an average accuracy of 66.67 and 58.33% using the oxygenated (HbO) and deoxygenated (HbR) hemoglobin signal respectively. For half of the participants, an accuracy of 83.33% or higher was reached using either the HbO signal or the HbR signal. For four participants, effective communication with 100% accuracy was achieved using either the HbO or HbR signal. An explorative analysis investigated the differentiability of the two mental tasks based solely on spatial fNIRS signal features. Using multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) group single-trial accuracies of 58.33% (using 20 training trials per task) and 60.56% (using 40 training trials per task) could be obtained. Combining the five trials per run using a majority voting approach heightened these MVPA accuracies to 62.04 and 75%. Additionally, an fNIRS suitability questionnaire capturing participants' physical features was administered to explore its predictive value for evaluating general data quality. Obtained questionnaire scores correlated significantly (

Indexed as

binary communicationbrain computer interfacefunctional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS)mental drawingmental imagerymotor imageryspatial navigationyes/no decoding

Identifiers

PMID32351371
PMCPMC7174771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.