Article in Plant signaling & behavior, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Wenyi LuJiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology/Co-Innovation Center for Modern Production Technology of Grain Crops/Joint International Research Laboratory of Agriculture &agri-product Safety, Yangzhou University , Yangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6143-8319
Li XuJiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology/Co-Innovation Center for Modern Production Technology of Grain Crops/Joint International Research Laboratory of Agriculture &agri-product Safety, Yangzhou University , Yangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6116-2749
Yiyan ZhangJiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology/Co-Innovation Center for Modern Production Technology of Grain Crops/Joint International Research Laboratory of Agriculture &agri-product Safety, Yangzhou University , Yangzhou, China.
Xinglei HuangJiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology/Co-Innovation Center for Modern Production Technology of Grain Crops/Joint International Research Laboratory of Agriculture &agri-product Safety, Yangzhou University , Yangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8869-6940
Gang ChenJiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology/Co-Innovation Center for Modern Production Technology of Grain Crops/Joint International Research Laboratory of Agriculture &agri-product Safety, Yangzhou University , Yangzhou, China.
Fei XiongJiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology/Co-Innovation Center for Modern Production Technology of Grain Crops/Joint International Research Laboratory of Agriculture &agri-product Safety, Yangzhou University , Yangzhou, China.
Yunfei WuJiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology/Co-Innovation Center for Modern Production Technology of Grain Crops/Joint International Research Laboratory of Agriculture &agri-product Safety, Yangzhou University , Yangzhou, China.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
Micro-nanoparticles can enter the root tissue of plant cells along with the multiple lanes, and then accumulate in the tissue. But the plant physiological effect is still less studied. In this study, rice seedlings at germination stage were treated with 100 µM NaBiF
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Study on the effect of sodium-nanoparticle in rice root development. · full record | OpenQuestion