Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32351028›Full record

ArticleEMBO reports2020

Distinct regulation of bioenergetics and translation by group I mGluR and NMDAR.

Sudhriti Ghosh Dastidar, Shreya Das Sharma, Sumita Chakraborty, Sumantra Chattarji, Aditi Bhattacharya, Ravi S Muddashetty

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EMBO reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. NMDAR mediated dynamic changes in mScientific reports · 2022
    Article
  7. A Ribosomal Perspective on Neuronal Local Protein Synthesis.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. APOE4 Affects Basal and NMDAR-Mediated Protein Synthesis in Neurons by Perturbing Calcium Homeostasis.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sudhriti Ghosh DastidarInstitute for Stem Cell Sciences and Regenerative Medicine, Bangalore, India.
Shreya Das SharmaInstitute for Stem Cell Sciences and Regenerative Medicine, Bangalore, India.
Sumita ChakrabortyInstitute for Stem Cell Sciences and Regenerative Medicine, Bangalore, India.
Sumantra ChattarjiInstitute for Stem Cell Sciences and Regenerative Medicine, Bangalore, India.
Aditi BhattacharyaInstitute for Stem Cell Sciences and Regenerative Medicine, Bangalore, India.
Ravi S MuddashettyInstitute for Stem Cell Sciences and Regenerative Medicine, Bangalore, India.ORCID 0000-0002-1373-6194
Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine · INManipal Academy of Higher Education · INNational Centre for Biological Sciences · INUniversity of Trans-Disciplinary Health Sciences and Technology · IN

Funding

Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology (DBT) BT/IN/Denmark/07/RSM/2015-2016Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology (DBT) BT/MB-CNDS/2013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuronal activity is responsible for the high energy consumption in the brain. However, the cellular mechanisms draining ATP upon the arrival of a stimulus are yet to be explored systematically at the post-synapse. Here, we provide evidence that a significant fraction of ATP is consumed upon glutamate stimulation to energize mGluR-induced protein synthesis. We find that both mGluR and NMDAR alter protein synthesis and ATP consumption with distinct kinetics at the synaptic-dendritic compartments. While mGluR activation leads to a rapid and sustained reduction in neuronal ATP levels, NMDAR activation has no immediate impact on the same. ATP consumption correlates inversely with the kinetics of protein synthesis for both receptors. We observe a persistent elevation in protein synthesis within 5 minutes of mGluR activation and a robust inhibition of the same within 2 minutes of NMDAR activation, assessed by the phosphorylation status of eEF2 and metabolic labeling. However, a delayed protein synthesis-dependent ATP expenditure ensues after 15 minutes of NMDAR stimulation. We identify a central role for AMPK in the correlation between protein synthesis and ATP consumption. AMPK is dephosphorylated and inhibited upon mGluR activation, while it is phosphorylated upon NMDAR activation. Perturbing AMPK activity disrupts receptor-specific modulations of eEF2 phosphorylation and protein synthesis. Our observations, therefore, demonstrate that the regulation of the AMPK-eEF2 signaling axis by glutamate receptors alters neuronal protein synthesis and bioenergetics.

Indexed as

Receptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateSynapsesEnergy MetabolismPeptide Elongation Factor 2PhosphorylationPeptide Elongation Factor 2Receptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateAMP-activated protein kinasebioenergeticsmGluRNMDARprotein synthesis

Identifiers

PMID32351028
PMCPMC7271334
OpenAlexW3021030976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.