Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32350999›Full record

ArticlePsycho-oncology2020

Evaluation of a novel telemedicine-based intervention to manage body image disturbance in head and neck cancer survivors.

Evan M Graboyes, Stacey Maurer, Yeonhee Park, Courtney H Marsh, James T McElligott, Terry A Day, Joshua D Hornig, Katherine R Sterba

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psycho-oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Predictors of survival among head and neck cancer patients after radiotherapy based on health-related quality of life indices and symptoms-specific outcomes: a systematic review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Mechanism underlying a brief cognitive behavioral treatment for head and neck cancer survivors with body image distress.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Psychological Survivorship in Head and Neck Cancer.Seminars in plastic surgery · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Influence of travel burden on tumor classification and survival of head and neck cancer patients.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Evan M GraboyesDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC), Charleston, South Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3766-468X
Stacey MaurerHollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC), Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Yeonhee ParkHollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC), Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Courtney H MarshDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC), Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
James T McElligottDepartment of Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC), Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Terry A DayDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC), Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Joshua D HornigDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC), Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Katherine R SterbaHollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC), Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Medical University of South Carolina · US

Funding

Translational Science Laboratory Shared ResourceP30CA138313 · NCI · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI Jian Ouyang · 2009 to 2026
$42.7M
South Carolina Clinical & Translational Research Institute (SCTR)UL1TR000062 · NCATS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI BRADY, KATHLEEN T. · 2012 to 2014
$9.4M
HRSA HHS U66 RH31458-01-00NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000062NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR000062NCI NIH HHS P30 CA138313NCI NIH HHS P30CA138313
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary clinical impact of BRIGHT (Building a Renewed ImaGe after Head & neck cancer Treatment), a novel telemedicine-based cognitive-behavioral intervention to manage body image disturbance (BID) in head and neck cancer (HNC) survivors.

methodsHead and neck cancer survivors with BID were enrolled into a single-arm pilot trial. Participants completed study measures at baseline, 1- and 3-months post-BRIGHT to assess its acceptability and clinical impact. Participants completed semi-structured interviews to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of BRIGHT and refine the intervention.

resultsTen HNC survivors with BID were enrolled into the trial of tablet-based BRIGHT. BRIGHT was feasible, as judged by low dropout (n = 1), high session completion rates (100%; 45/45) and low rates of technical issues with the tablet-based delivery (11% minor; 0% major). Ninety percent of participants were highly likely to recommend BRIGHT, reflecting its acceptability. BRIGHT was associated with a 34.5% reduction in mean Body Image Scale scores at 1-month post-BRIGHT (mean difference from baseline = 4.56; 95% CI 1.55, 7.56), an effect that was durable at 3-months post-BRIGHT (mean decrease from baseline = 3.56; 95% CI 1.15-5.96). Program evaluation revealed high levels of satisfaction with BRIGHT, particularly the delivery platform. During the qualitative evaluation, participants highlighted that BRIGHT improved image-related coping behavior.

conclusionsBRIGHT is feasible, acceptable to HNC survivors, and has significant potential as a novel approach to manage BID in HNC survivors. Additional research is necessary to refine BRIGHT and evaluate its clinical efficacy and scalability.

Indexed as

Body Dysmorphic DisordersBody ImageCancer SurvivorsCognitive Behavioral TherapyHead and Neck NeoplasmsTelemedicineAdaptation, PsychologicalAdolescentAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient Satisfactionbody imagecancercognitive-behavioral therapyhead and neck canceroncologytelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID32350999
PMCPMC7606304
OpenAlexW3023051232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.