Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32350988›Full record

ArticleCancer science2020

Accurate quantification of urinary metabolites for predictive models manifest clinicopathology of renal cell carcinoma.

Tomonori Sato, Yoshihide Kawasaki, Masamitsu Maekawa, Shinya Takasaki, Shuichi Shimada, Kento Morozumi, Masahiko Sato, Naoki Kawamorita, Shinichi Yamashita, Koji Mitsuzuka and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Kynurenine pathway in kidney diseases.Pharmacological reports : PR · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Tomonori SatoDepartment of Urology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5659-6809
Yoshihide KawasakiDepartment of Urology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Masamitsu MaekawaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan.
Shinya TakasakiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan.
Shuichi ShimadaDepartment of Urology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Kento MorozumiDepartment of Urology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Masahiko SatoDepartment of Urology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Naoki KawamoritaDepartment of Urology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Shinichi YamashitaDepartment of Urology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Koji MitsuzukaDepartment of Urology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Nariyasu ManoDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan.
Akihiro ItoDepartment of Urology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.

Funding

JSPS KAKENHI JP17K07210JSPS KAKENHI JP18K16683
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using surgically resected tissue, we identified characteristic metabolites related to the diagnosis and malignant status of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Specifically, we quantified these metabolites in urine samples to evaluate their potential as clinically useful noninvasive biomarkers of ccRCC. Between January 2016 and August 2018, we collected urine samples from 87 patients who had pathologically diagnosed ccRCC and from 60 controls who were patients with benign urological conditions. Metabolite concentrations in urine samples were investigated using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry with an internal standard and adjustment based on urinary creatinine levels. We analyzed the association between metabolite concentration and predictability of diagnosis and of malignant status by multiple logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to establish ccRCC predictive models. Of the 47 metabolites identified in our previous study, we quantified 33 metabolites in the urine samples. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed 5 metabolites (l-glutamic acid, lactate, d-sedoheptulose 7-phosphate, 2-hydroxyglutarate, and myoinositol) for a diagnostic predictive model and 4 metabolites (l-kynurenine, l-glutamine, fructose 6-phosphate, and butyrylcarnitine) for a predictive model for clinical stage III/IV. The sensitivity and specificity of the diagnostic predictive model were 93.1% and 95.0%, respectively, yielding an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.966. The sensitivity and specificity of the predictive model for clinical stage were 88.5% and 75.4%, respectively, with an AUC of 0.837. In conclusion, quantitative analysis of urinary metabolites yielded predictive models for diagnosis and malignant status of ccRCC. Urinary metabolites have the potential to be clinically useful noninvasive biomarkers of ccRCC to improve patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorAdultAgedAged, 80 and overArea Under CurveCarcinoma, Renal CellChromatography, LiquidComorbidityFemaleHumansKidney NeoplasmsMaleMetabolomeMetabolomicsMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingBiomarkers, Tumorbiomarkermetabolomicspredictive modelrenal cell carcinomaurinary metabolite

Identifiers

PMID32350988
PMCPMC7385347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.