Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32350928›Full record

ReviewFASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology2020

Rethinking the role of hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of COVID-19.

Eric A Meyerowitz, Augustin G L Vannier, Morgan G N Friesen, Sara Schoenfeld, Jeffrey A Gelfand, Michael V Callahan, Arthur Y Kim, Patrick M Reeves, Mark C Poznansky

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Safety profile of COVID-19 drugs in a real clinical setting.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2022
    Review
  14. Antimalarials - old drugs are new again.Postepy dermatologii i alergologii · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The COVID-19 Patient in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit.The Surgical clinics of North America · 2022
    Review
  18. Closing the Gap on COVID-19 Vaccinations in First Responders and Beyond: Increasing Trust.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Eric A MeyerowitzDivision of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) and Harvard Medical School (HMS), Boston, MA, USA.
Augustin G L VannierDivision of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) and Harvard Medical School (HMS), Boston, MA, USA.
Morgan G N FriesenDivision of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) and Harvard Medical School (HMS), Boston, MA, USA.
Sara SchoenfeldDivision of Allergy, Immunology and Rheumatology, MGH and HMS, Boston, MA, USA.
Jeffrey A GelfandDivision of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) and Harvard Medical School (HMS), Boston, MA, USA.
Michael V CallahanDivision of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) and Harvard Medical School (HMS), Boston, MA, USA.
Arthur Y KimDivision of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) and Harvard Medical School (HMS), Boston, MA, USA.
Patrick M ReevesDivision of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) and Harvard Medical School (HMS), Boston, MA, USA.
Mark C PoznanskyDivision of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) and Harvard Medical School (HMS), Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are currently no proven or approved treatments for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Early anecdotal reports and limited in vitro data led to the significant uptake of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), and to lesser extent chloroquine (CQ), for many patients with this disease. As an increasing number of patients with COVID-19 are treated with these agents and more evidence accumulates, there continues to be no high-quality clinical data showing a clear benefit of these agents for this disease. Moreover, these agents have the potential to cause harm, including a broad range of adverse events including serious cardiac side effects when combined with other agents. In addition, the known and potent immunomodulatory effects of these agents which support their use in the treatment of auto-immune conditions, and provided a component in the original rationale for their use in patients with COVID-19, may, in fact, undermine their utility in the context of the treatment of this respiratory viral infection. Specifically, the impact of HCQ on cytokine production and suppression of antigen presentation may have immunologic consequences that hamper innate and adaptive antiviral immune responses for patients with COVID-19. Similarly, the reported in vitro inhibition of viral proliferation is largely derived from the blockade of viral fusion that initiates infection rather than the direct inhibition of viral replication as seen with nucleoside/tide analogs in other viral infections. Given these facts and the growing uncertainty about these agents for the treatment of COVID-19, it is clear that at the very least thoughtful planning and data collection from randomized clinical trials are needed to understand what if any role these agents may have in this disease. In this article, we review the datasets that support or detract from the use of these agents for the treatment of COVID-19 and render a data informed opinion that they should only be used with caution and in the context of carefully thought out clinical trials, or on a case-by-case basis after rigorous consideration of the risks and benefits of this therapeutic approach.

Indexed as

Coronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19Datasets as TopicHeartHumansHydroxychloroquineImmunity, InnatePandemicsPneumonia, ViralRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicHydroxychloroquinecoronavirusCOV-SARS-2immuneimmunologySARS

Identifiers

PMID32350928
PMCPMC7267640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.