Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32350871›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2020

Analysis of vaginal delivery outcomes among pregnant women in Wuhan, China during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Jing Liao, Xiaoyan He, Qing Gong, Lingyun Yang, Chunhua Zhou, Jiafu Li

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Maternal and perinatal outcomes in pregnant women infected by SARS-CoV-2: A meta-analysis.European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. COVID-19 and pregnancy: A review of clinical characteristics, obstetric outcomes and vertical transmission.The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 2020
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Effects of COVID-19 Infection during Pregnancy and Neonatal Prognosis: What Is the Evidence?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jing LiaoDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Xiaoyan HeDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Qing GongDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Lingyun YangDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Chunhua ZhouDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Jiafu LiDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Wuhan University · CNZhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University · CN

Funding

Hubei Science and Technology Department
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo study vaginal delivery outcomes and neonatal prognosis and summarize the management of vaginal delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsA retrospective analysis of medical records and comparison of vaginal delivery outcomes between 10 pregnant women with clinical diagnosis of COVID-19 and 53 pregnant women without COVID-19 admitted to Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University between January 20 and March 2, 2020. Results of laboratory tests, imaging tests, and SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid tests were also analyzed in neonates delivered by pregnant women with clinical diagnosis of COVID-19.

resultsThere were no significant differences in gestational age, postpartum hemorrhage, and perineal resection rates between the two groups. There were no significant differences in birth weight of neonates and neonatal asphyxia rates between the two groups. Neonates delivered by pregnant women with clinical diagnosis of COVID-19 tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 infection.

conclusionsUnder the premise of full evaluation of vaginal delivery conditions and strict protection measures, pregnant women with ordinary type COVID-19 can try vaginal delivery without exacerbation of COVID-19 and without increasing the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in neonates.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusAdultBirth WeightChinaCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19Delivery, ObstetricFemaleHospitalizationHumansInfant, NewbornInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalPandemicsPneumonia, ViralPostpartum HemorrhagePregnancyChinaCOVID-19ManagementNeonatal outcomePregnancyVaginal delivery

Identifiers

PMID32350871
PMCPMC9087609
OpenAlexW3021378982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.