ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2020
Bioremediation treatment improves water quality for Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) under crude oil pollution.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Industrial effluent-derivedApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026Article
- Crude oil exploration in Africa: socio-economic implications, environmental impacts, and mitigation strategies.Environment systems & decisions · 2022Review
- Improving the Bioremediation and in situ Production of Biocompounds of a Biodiesel-Contaminated Soil.Environmental management · 2021Article
- Enzyme ChE, cholinergic therapy and molecular docking: Significant considerations and future perspectives.International journal of immunopathology and pharmacologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Despite favorable publicity of bioremediation as an affordable technology for cleanup of crude oil, public concerns on ecological safety in the presence of residual oil remain a global challenge. In this study, effects of crude oil exposure at sublethal concentration (0.25% v/v) and bioremediation treatment were investigated on histology and biochemical parameters of organs (gills, liver, kidney, and brain) of juvenile Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Ten percent (10%) of mixed bacterial culture was used for bioaugmentation treatment. Ninety juvenile fish were used for study, and experiments were carried out in triplicates for three different groups. Malondialdehyde (MDA), an index of lipid peroxidation, was assayed as biomarker for oxidative stress. Activities of antioxidant enzymes (superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT)), level of non-enzymatic antioxidant (reduced glutathione (GSH)), and activity of brain acetylcholinesterase (AChE) were assayed in selected fish organs as markers for environmental stressor. Histological examination of fish organs was done for all groups. Results of treated groups were compared with those of the control. Levels of MDA significantly increased with significant inhibition of antioxidant enzyme activities in the polluted group. Activities of SOD, CAT, and AChE and levels of GSH in fish organs in the bioaugmentation group were similar to results obtained in the control. Remarkably, the bioaugmentation group showed minimal or no lesions which suggested the efficacy of bioremediation technique in alleviating crude oil toxicity and preserving normal physiology of fish. This study provides deeper insights into the ecosafety of bioremediation treatment and can be extrapolated to other species of fish.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.