Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32350797›Full record

ArticleLa Radiologia medica2021

Artificial intelligence: radiologists' expectations and opinions gleaned from a nationwide online survey.

Francesca Coppola, Lorenzo Faggioni, Daniele Regge, Andrea Giovagnoni, Rita Golfieri, Corrado Bibbolino, Vittorio Miele, Emanuele Neri, Roberto Grassi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in La Radiologia medica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 108 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
108citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

108 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 167 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Artificial Intelligence in Radiology: A Leadership Survey.Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

48 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Francesca CoppolaDepartment of Specialized, Diagnostic and Experimental Medicine (DIMES), S. Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Lorenzo FaggioniDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Department of Translational Research, University of Pisa, Via Roma, 67, 56126, Pisa, Italy. lfaggioni@sirm.org.
Daniele ReggeDepartment of Radiology, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy.
Andrea GiovagnoniRadiology Department, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Rita GolfieriDepartment of Specialized, Diagnostic and Experimental Medicine (DIMES), S. Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Corrado BibbolinoSNR Foundation, Rome, Italy.
Vittorio MieleDepartment of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.
Emanuele NeriDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Department of Translational Research, University of Pisa, Via Roma, 67, 56126, Pisa, Italy.
Roberto GrassiDepartment of Precision Medicine, University of Campania, Naples, Italy.
University of Bologna · ITUniversity of Pisa · ITAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITCandiolo Cancer Institute · ITMarche Polytechnic University · ITUniversity of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo report the results of a nationwide online survey on artificial intelligence (AI) among radiologist members of the Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM). METHODS AND MATERIALS: All members were invited to the survey as an initiative by the Imaging Informatics Chapter of SIRM. The survey consisted of 13 questions about the participants' demographic information, perceived advantages and issues related to AI implementation in radiological practice, and their overall opinion about AI.

resultsIn total, 1032 radiologists (equaling 9.5% of active SIRM members for the year 2019) joined the survey. Perceived AI advantages included a lower diagnostic error rate (750/1027, 73.0%) and optimization of radiologists' work (697/1027, 67.9%). The risk of a poorer professional reputation of radiologists compared with non-radiologists (617/1024, 60.3%), and increased costs and workload due to AI system maintenance and data analysis (399/1024, 39.0%) were seen as potential issues. Most radiologists stated that specific policies should regulate the use of AI (933/1032, 90.4%) and were not afraid of losing their job due to it (917/1032, 88.9%). Overall, 77.0% of respondents (794/1032) were favorable to the adoption of AI, whereas 18.0% (186/1032) were uncertain and 5.0% (52/1032) were unfavorable.

conclusionsRadiologists had a mostly positive attitude toward the implementation of AI in their working practice. They were not concerned that AI will replace them, but rather that it might diminish their professional reputation.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceAttitude of Health PersonnelRadiologistsHumansItalySocieties, MedicalSurveys and QuestionnairesArtificial intelligenceOnline surveyRadiology

Identifiers

PMID32350797
OpenAlexW3021285554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.